Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2

He, Zhili, Xu, Meiying, Deng, Ye, Kang, Sanghoon, Kellogg, Laurie, Wu, Liyou, Van Nostrand, Joy D., Hobbie, Sarah E., Reich, Peter B., Zhou, Jizhong·2010·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 564–575 Understanding the responses of biological communities to elevated CO 2 (eCO 2) is a central issue in ecology, but little is known about the influence of eCO 2 on the structure and functioning (and consequent feedbacks to plant productivity) of the belowground microbial community. Here, using metagenomic technologies, we showed that 10 years of field exposure of a grassland ecosystem to eCO 2 dramatically altered the structure and functional potential of soil microbial communities. Total microbial and bacterial biomass were significantly increased at eCO 2, but fungal biomass was unaffected. The structure of microbial communities was markedly different between ambient CO 2 (aCO 2) and eCO 2 as indicated by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of gene‐based pyrosequencing data and functional gene array data. While the abundance of genes involved in decomposing recalcitrant C remained unchanged, those involved in labile C degradation and C and N fixation were significantly increased under eCO 2. Changes in microbial structure were significantly correlated with soil C and N contents and plant productivity. This study provides insights into potential activity of microbial community and associated feedback responses of terrestrial ecosystems to eCO 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01453.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
He, Z., Xu, M., Deng, Y., Kang, S., Kellogg, L., Wu, L., Van Nostrand, J. D., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., & Zhou, J.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-16
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
564-575
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2149874521
Cited by
283
References
4
FWCI
40.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01453.x
The paper
He, Z., Xu, M., Deng, Y., Kang, S., Kellogg, L., Wu, L., Van Nostrand, J. D., Hobbie, S. E., Reich, P. B., & Zhou, J. (2010). Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01453.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.