Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context

Buckley, Yvonne M., Ramula, Satu, Blomberg, Simon P., Burns, Jean H., Crone, Elizabeth E., Ehrlén, Johan, Knight, Tiffany M., Pichancourt, Jean‐Baptiste, Quested, Helen, Wardle, Glenda M.·2010·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 1182–1197 Explaining variation in population growth rates is fundamental to predicting population dynamics and population responses to environmental change. In this study, we used matrix population models, which link birth, growth and survival to population growth rate, to examine how and why population growth rates vary within and among 50 terrestrial plant species. Population growth rates were more similar within species than among species; with phylogeny having a minimal influence on among‐species variation. Most population growth rates decreased over the observation period and were negatively autocorrelated between years; that is, higher than average population growth rates tended to be followed by lower than average population growth rates. Population growth rates varied more through time than space; this temporal variation was due mostly to variation in post‐seedling survival and for a subset of species was partly explained by response to environmental factors, such as fire and herbivory. Stochastic population growth rates departed from mean matrix population growth rate for temporally autocorrelated environments. Our findings indicate that demographic data and models of closely related plant species cannot necessarily be used to make recommendations for conservation or control, and that post‐seedling survival and the sequence of environmental conditions are critical for determining plant population growth rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01506.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Buckley, Y. M., Ramula, S., Blomberg, S. P., Burns, J. H., Crone, E. E., Ehrlén, J., Knight, T. M., Pichancourt, J., Quested, H., & Wardle, G. M.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-15
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
1182-1197
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2125700078
Cited by
189
References
2
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01506.x
The paper
Buckley, Y. M., Ramula, S., Blomberg, S. P., Burns, J. H., Crone, E. E., Ehrlén, J., Knight, T. M., Pichancourt, J., Quested, H., & Wardle, G. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01506.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.