The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context
Abstract
Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 1182–1197 Explaining variation in population growth rates is fundamental to predicting population dynamics and population responses to environmental change. In this study, we used matrix population models, which link birth, growth and survival to population growth rate, to examine how and why population growth rates vary within and among 50 terrestrial plant species. Population growth rates were more similar within species than among species; with phylogeny having a minimal influence on among‐species variation. Most population growth rates decreased over the observation period and were negatively autocorrelated between years; that is, higher than average population growth rates tended to be followed by lower than average population growth rates. Population growth rates varied more through time than space; this temporal variation was due mostly to variation in post‐seedling survival and for a subset of species was partly explained by response to environmental factors, such as fire and herbivory. Stochastic population growth rates departed from mean matrix population growth rate for temporally autocorrelated environments. Our findings indicate that demographic data and models of closely related plant species cannot necessarily be used to make recommendations for conservation or control, and that post‐seedling survival and the sequence of environmental conditions are critical for determining plant population growth rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/b98882 · Cited by 930
Cited by
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change
Ehrlén, J., & Morris, W. F. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12410 · Cited by 490
Self-citationNiche Breadth: Causes and Consequences for Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation
Carscadden, K. A., Emery, N. C., Arnillas, C. A., Cadotte, M. W., Afkhami, M. E., Gravel, D., Livingstone, S. W., & Wiens, J. J. (2020) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/710388 · Cited by 355
The compadre Plant Matrix Database: an open online repository for plant demography
Salguero‐Gómez, R., Jones, O. R., Archer, C. R., Buckley, Y. M., Che‐Castaldo, J., Caswell, H., Hodgson, D., Scheuerlein, A., Conde, D. A., Brinks, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12334 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, Y. M., Ramula, S., Blomberg, S. P., Burns, J. H., Crone, E. E., Ehrlén, J., Knight, T. M., Pichancourt, J., Quested, H., & Wardle, G. M.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1182-1197
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2125700078
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01506.x
- The paper
- Buckley, Y. M., Ramula, S., Blomberg, S. P., Burns, J. H., Crone, E. E., Ehrlén, J., Knight, T. M., Pichancourt, J., Quested, H., & Wardle, G. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of variation in plant population growth rate: a synthesis of matrix population models in a phylogenetic context. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01506.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.