The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composition of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes
Abstract
Summary: The diversity of freshwater bacterioplankton communities has not been extensively studied despite their key role in foodwebs and the cycling of carbon and associated major elements. In order to explore and characterize the composition of bacterioplankton associated with cyanobacterial blooms, large 16S rRNA clone libraries from four lakes experiencing such blooms were analysed. The four libraries contained 1461 clones, of which 559 were prokaryotic sequences of non‐cyanobacterial origin. These clones were classified into 158 operational taxonomic units affiliated mainly with bacterial divisions commonly found in freshwater systems, e.g. Proteobacteria, Bacteriodetes, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes . Richness and evenness of non‐cyanobacterial clones were similar to other clone libraries obtained for freshwater bacterioplankton, suggesting that bacterial communities accompanying cyanobacterial blooms are as diverse as non‐bloom communities. Many of the identified operational taxonomic units grouped with known freshwater clusters but the libraries also contained novel clusters of bacterial sequences that may be characteristic for cyanobacterial blooms. About 25% of the operational taxonomic units were detected in more than one lake. Even so, 16S rRNA heterogeneity analysis demonstrated large differences in community composition between lakes regardless of their similar characteristics and close proximity. Hence even the similar environmental conditions created by different cyanobacterial blooms may foster very dissimilar bacterial communities, which could indicate that the genetic diversity in lake bacteria have been underestimated in the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Cited by
Rajilić‐Stojanović, M., Heilig, H. G. H. J., Molenaar, D., Kajander, K., Surakka, A., Smidt, H., & De Vos, W. M. (2009) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01900.x · Cited by 484
Webster, N. S., Taylor, M. W., Behnam, F., Lücker, S., Rattei, T., Whalan, S., Horn, M., & Wagner, M. (2010) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02065.x · Cited by 420
Oligotrophs versus copiotrophs
Koch, A. L. (2001) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.1091 · Cited by 348
Wu, Q. L., & Hahn, M. W. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00105.x · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Eiler, A., & Bertilsson, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1228-1243
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2146664084
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00657.x
- The paper
- Eiler, A., & Bertilsson, S. (2004). Composition of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00657.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.