The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection and quantification of the human‐specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker with real‐time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater
Abstract
Summary: The human‐specific HF183 Bacteriodes 16S rRNA genetic marker can be used to detect human faecal pollution in water environments. However, there is currently no method to quantify the prevalence of this marker in environmental samples. We developed a real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay using SYBR Green I detection to quantify this marker in faecal and environmental samples. To decrease the amplicon length to a suitable size for real‐time PCR detection, a new reverse primer was designed and validated on human and animal faecal samples. The use of the newly developed reverse primer in combination with the human‐specific HF183 primer did not decrease the specificity of the real‐time PCR assay but a melting curve analysis must always be included. This new assay was more sensitive than conventional PCR and highly reproducible with a coefficient of variation of less than 1% within an assay and 3% between assays. As the Bacteroides species that carries this human‐specific marker has never been isolated, a bacteria real‐time assay was used to determine the detection efficiency. The estimated detection efficiency in freshwater ranged from 78% to 91% of the true value with an average detection efficiency of 83 ± 4% of the true value. Using a simple filtration method, the limit of quantification was 4.7 ± 0.3 × 10 5 human‐specific Bacteroides markers per litre of freshwater. The aerobic incubation of the human‐specific Bacteroides marker in freshwater for up to 24 days at 4 and 12°C, and up to 8 days at 28°C, indicated that the marker persisted up to the end of the incubation period for all incubation temperatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kildare, B. J., Leutenegger, C. M., McSwain, B. S., Bambic, D. G., Rajal, V. B., & Wuertz, S. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.037 · Cited by 451
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: A twenty-seven lab evaluation study
Boehm, A. B., Van De Werfhorst, L. C., Griffith, J. F., Holden, P. A., Jay, J. A., Shanks, O. C., Wang, D., & Weisberg, S. B. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046 · Cited by 313
Sidhu, J. P. S., Ahmed, W., Gernjak, W., Aryal, R., McCarthy, D., Palmer, A., Kolotelo, P., & Toze, S. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.020 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Seurinck, S., Defoirdt, T., Verstraete, W., & Siciliano, S. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-259
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2095920248
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection and quantification of the human‐specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker with real‐time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00702.x
- The paper
- Seurinck, S., Defoirdt, T., Verstraete, W., & Siciliano, S. D. (2005). Detection and quantification of the human‐specific HF183 Bacteroides 16S rRNA genetic marker with real‐time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00702.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.