The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river
Abstract
Summary: The biodiversity of the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an aquatic environment (the Woluwe River, Brussels, Belgium) was analysed. Surface water was sampled bimonthly over a 1‐year period (2000–2001) at seven sites evenly dispersed over the river. Total bacterial counts were performed and P. aeruginosa strains were isolated on a selective medium. A weighed out sample of 100 randomly chosen presumptive P. aeruginosa isolates was further analysed. A set of data consisting of the nucleotide sequence of the oprL gene, a DNA‐based fingerprint ( a mplified f ragment l ength p olymorphism, AFLP), serotype, pyoverdine type and antibiogram (MICs of 21 clinically relevant antibiotics) was assembled. These data were integrated with those previously obtained for 73 P. aeruginosa clinical and environmental isolates collected across the world. The combined results were analysed and compared using biological data analysis software. Our findings indicate a positive relationship between the extent of pollution and the prevalence of P. aeruginosa . Surprisingly, the Woluwe River P. aeruginosa community was almost as diverse as the global P. aeruginosa population. Indeed, the Woluwe River harboured members of nearly all successful clonal complexes. With the exception of one multidrug‐resistant (MDR) strain, belonging to a ubiquitous and clinically relevant serotype O11 clone, antibiotic resistance levels were relatively low. These findings illustrate the significance of river water as a reservoir and source of distribution of potentially pathogenic P. aeruginosa strains and could have repercussions on antinosocomial infection strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Buckling, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02744 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Rethinking 'secondary' metabolism: physiological roles for phenazine antibiotics
Price-Whelan, A., Dietrich, L. E. P., & Newman, D. K. (2006) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio764 · Cited by 584
D'Argenio, D. A., Wu, M., Hoffman, L. R., Kulasekara, H. D., Déziel, E., Smith, E. E., Nguyen, H., Ernst, R. K., Larson Freeman, T. J., Spencer, D. H., et al. (2007) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05678.x · Cited by 342
The Accessory Genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Kung, V. L., Ozer, E. A., & Hauser, A. R. (2010) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00027-10 · Cited by 334
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Population Structure Revisited
Pirnay, J.-P., Bilocq, F., Pot, B., Cornelis, P., Zizi, M., Van Eldere, J., Deschaght, P., Vaneechoutte, M., Jennes, S., Pitt, T., et al. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007740 · Cited by 307
Self-citationButaitė, E., Baumgartner, M., Wyder, S., & Kümmerli, R. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00509-4 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Pirnay, J., Matthijs, S., Colak, H., Chablain, P., Bilocq, F., Van Eldere, J., De Vos, D., Zizi, M., Triest, L., & Cornelis, P.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 969-980
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2001627865
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00776.x
- The paper
- Pirnay, J., Matthijs, S., Colak, H., Chablain, P., Bilocq, F., Van Eldere, J., De Vos, D., Zizi, M., Triest, L., & Cornelis, P. (2005). Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00776.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.