Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils

Kolb, Steffen, Knief, Claudia, Dunfield, Peter F., Conrad, Ralf·2005·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The activity and abundance of methanotrophic bacteria were measured in an acidic and a neutral forest soil. The soils exhibited high uptake rates (>30 µg CH 4 m −2 h −1 ) of atmospheric CH 4 at all measurement times throughout the vegetation period. The abundances of various phylogenetic groups of methanotrophs, including some uncultured putative ones, were measured using real‐time polymerase chain reaction assays. Each assay specifically targeted the pmoA gene or mmoX gene of a particular group of methanotrophs, or the amoA gene of ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria. As yet uncultured methanotrophs of a group previously named ‘forest soil cluster’ or ‘USCα’ were numerically dominant in the acidic soil, while cultured but taxonomically uncharacterized methanotrophs of a group ‘Cluster I’ were dominant in the neutral soil. Each group was detected in numbers equivalent to about 10 6 pmoA gene copies per gram dry weight of soil and comprised >90% of the detectable methanotrophic bacteria in the respective soil. As the numbers of ammonia‐oxidizing bacteria were similar but not higher, they could not have accounted for the observed CH 4 uptake rates due to their low cell‐specific CH 4 oxidation activity. Based on CH 4 flux and bacterial abundance data, estimated cell‐specific CH 4 oxidation rates of the detected methanotrophic bacteria were 540–800 × 10 −18 mol cell −1 h −1 , which is high compared with literature values of cultured methanotrophic bacteria. These estimated cell‐specific CH 4 oxidation rates are sufficiently high to allow not only maintenance but even growth on atmospheric CH 4 alone. Transcripts of mRNA of the pmoA gene were detected in the acidic soil, demonstrating that USCα methanotrophs expressed pmoA under ambient methane mixing ratios. On the other hand, pmoA trancripts of Cluster I or of other methanotrophic groups were not detectable. Our study suggests that USCα and Cluster I methanotrophs are adapted to the low concentration of methane in forest soils by possessing high cell‐specific CH 4 oxidation activities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00791.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Kolb, S., Knief, C., Dunfield, P. F., & Conrad, R.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-08
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
1150-1161
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2166584324
Cited by
192
References
1
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00791.x
The paper
Kolb, S., Knief, C., Dunfield, P. F., & Conrad, R. (2005). Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00791.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.