The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway
Abstract
Summary: Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission from soils is a major contributor to the atmospheric loading of this potent greenhouse gas. It is thought that autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are a significant source of soil‐derived N 2 O and a denitrification pathway (i.e. reduction of NO 2 – to NO and N 2 O), so‐called nitrifier denitrification, has been demonstrated as a N 2 O production mechanism in Nitrosomonas europaea. It is thought that Nitrosospira spp. are the dominant AOB in soil, but little information is available on their ability to produce N 2 O or on the existence of a nitrifier denitrification pathway in this lineage. This study aims to characterize N 2 O production and nitrifier denitrification in seven strains of AOB representative of clusters 0, 2 and 3 in the cultured Nitrosospira lineage. Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718 and ATCC 25978 were analysed for comparison. The aerobically incubated test strains produced significant ( P < 0.001) amounts of N 2 O and total N 2 O production rates ranged from 2.0 amol cell −1 h −1 , in Nitrosospira tenuis strain NV12, to 58.0 amol cell −1 h −1 , in N. europaea ATCC 19718. Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718 was atypical in that it produced four times more N 2 O than the next highest producing strain. All AOB tested were able to carry out nitrifier denitrification under aerobic conditions, as determined by production of 15 N‐N 2 O from applied 15 N‐NO 2 – . Up to 13.5% of the N 2 O produced was derived from the exogenously applied 15 N‐NO 2 – . The results suggest that nitrifier denitrification could be a universal trait in the betaproteobacterial AOB and its potential ecological significance is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited
Nikaido, H. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.4.593-656.2003 · Cited by 4,316
Brondijk, T. H. C., Fiegen, D., Richardson, D. J., & Cole, J. A. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02875.x · Cited by 342
Cited by
Xu, N., Tan, G., Wang, H., & Gai, X. (2016) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.02.004 · Cited by 1,180
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Microbial ecology of denitrification in biological wastewater treatment
Lu, H., Chandran, K., & Stensel, D. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.06.042 · Cited by 717
Hayatsu, M., Tago, K., & Saito, M. (2008) · Soil Science and Plant Nutrition · doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00195.x · Cited by 665
Physiology and Diversity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea
Stahl, D. A., & de la Torre, J. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150128 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaw, L. J., Nicol, G. W., Smith, Z., Fear, J., Prosser, J. I., & Baggs, E. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 214-222
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2116588445
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00882.x
- The paper
- Shaw, L. J., Nicol, G. W., Smith, Z., Fear, J., Prosser, J. I., & Baggs, E. M. (2006). Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00882.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.