The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea
Abstract
Summary: The Black Sea, with its highly sulfidic water column, is the largest anoxic basin in the world. Within its sediments, the mineralization of organic matter occurs essentially through sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. In this study, the sulfate‐reducing community was investigated in order to understand how these microorganisms are distributed relative to the chemical zonation: in the upper sulfate zone, at the sulfate–methane transition zone, and deeply within the methane zone. Total bacteria were quantified by real‐time PCR of 16S rRNA genes whereas sulfate‐reducing microorganisms (SRM) were quantified by targeting their metabolic key gene, the dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase ( dsrA ). Sulfate‐reducing microorganisms were predominant in the sulfate zone but occurred also in the methane zone, relative proportion was maximal around the sulfate–methane transition, c . 30%, and equally high in the sulfate and methane zones, 5–10%. The dsrAB clone library from the sulfate–methane transition zone, showed mostly sequences affiliated with the Desulfobacteraceae . While, the dsrAB clone libraries from the upper, sulfate‐rich zone and the deep, sulfate‐poor zone were dominated by similar, novel deeply branching sequences which might represent Gram‐positive spore‐forming sulfate‐ and/or sulfite‐reducing microorganisms. We thus hypothesize that terminal carbon mineralization in surface sediments of the Black Sea is largely due to the sulfate reduction activity of previously hidden SRM. Although these novel SRM were also abundant in sulfate‐poor, methanogenic areas of the Black Sea sediment, their activities and possibly very versatile metabolic capabilities remain subject of further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations
Lever, M. A., Rogers, K. L., Lloyd, K. G., Overmann, J., Schink, B., Thauer, R. K., Hoehler, T. M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv020 · Cited by 378
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leloup, J., Loy, A., Knab, N. J., Borowski, C., Wagner, M., & Jørgensen, B. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2005040173
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x
- The paper
- Leloup, J., Loy, A., Knab, N. J., Borowski, C., Wagner, M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2007). Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.