Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea

Leloup, Julie, Loy, Alexander, Knab, Nina J., Borowski, Christian, Wagner, Michael, Jørgensen, Bo Barker·2007·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The Black Sea, with its highly sulfidic water column, is the largest anoxic basin in the world. Within its sediments, the mineralization of organic matter occurs essentially through sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. In this study, the sulfate‐reducing community was investigated in order to understand how these microorganisms are distributed relative to the chemical zonation: in the upper sulfate zone, at the sulfate–methane transition zone, and deeply within the methane zone. Total bacteria were quantified by real‐time PCR of 16S rRNA genes whereas sulfate‐reducing microorganisms (SRM) were quantified by targeting their metabolic key gene, the dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase ( dsrA ). Sulfate‐reducing microorganisms were predominant in the sulfate zone but occurred also in the methane zone, relative proportion was maximal around the sulfate–methane transition, c . 30%, and equally high in the sulfate and methane zones, 5–10%. The dsrAB clone library from the sulfate–methane transition zone, showed mostly sequences affiliated with the Desulfobacteraceae . While, the dsrAB clone libraries from the upper, sulfate‐rich zone and the deep, sulfate‐poor zone were dominated by similar, novel deeply branching sequences which might represent Gram‐positive spore‐forming sulfate‐ and/or sulfite‐reducing microorganisms. We thus hypothesize that terminal carbon mineralization in surface sediments of the Black Sea is largely due to the sulfate reduction activity of previously hidden SRM. Although these novel SRM were also abundant in sulfate‐poor, methanogenic areas of the Black Sea sediment, their activities and possibly very versatile metabolic capabilities remain subject of further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Leloup, J., Loy, A., Knab, N. J., Borowski, C., Wagner, M., & Jørgensen, B. B.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-14
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
131-142
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W2005040173
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x
The paper
Leloup, J., Loy, A., Knab, N. J., Borowski, C., Wagner, M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2007). Diversity and abundance of sulfate‐reducing microorganisms in the sulfate and methane zones of a marine sediment, Black Sea. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01122.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.