The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patterns of bacterial diversity across a range of Antarctic terrestrial habitats
Abstract
Summary: Although soil‐borne bacteria represent the world's greatest source of biological diversity, it is not well understood whether extreme environmental conditions, such as those found in Antarctic habitats, result in reduced soil‐borne microbial diversity. To address this issue, patterns of bacterial diversity were studied in soils sampled along a > 3200 km southern polar transect spanning a gradient of increased climate severity over 27° of latitude. Vegetated and fell‐field plots were sampled at the Falkland (51°S), South Georgia (54°S), Signy (60°S) and Anchorage Islands (67°S), while bare frost‐sorted soil polygons were examined at Fossil Bluff (71°S), Mars Oasis (72°S), Coal Nunatak (72°S) and the Ellsworth Mountains (78°S). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were recovered subsequent to direct DNA extraction from soil, polymerase chain reaction amplification and cloning. Although bacterial diversity was observed to decline with increased latitude, habitat‐specific patterns appeared to also be important. Namely, a negative relationship was found between bacterial diversity and latitude for fell‐field soils, but no such pattern was observed for vegetated sites. The Mars Oasis site, previously identified as a biodiversity hotspot within this region, proved exceptional within the study transect, with unusually high bacterial diversity. In independent analyses, geographical distance and vegetation cover were found to significantly influence bacterial community composition. These results provide insight into the factors shaping the composition of bacterial communities in Antarctic terrestrial habitats and support the notion that bacterial diversity declines with increased climatic severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
On the rocks: the microbiology of Antarctic Dry Valley soils
Cary, S. C., McDonald, I. R., Barrett, J. E., & Cowan, D. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2281 · Cited by 580
Biogeography of soil archaea and bacteria along a steep precipitation gradient
Angel, R., Soares, M. I. M., Ungar, E. D., & Gillor, O. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.136 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Yergeau, E., Newsham, K. K., Pearce, D. A., & Kowalchuk, G. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2670-2682
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2100962009
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of bacterial diversity across a range of Antarctic terrestrial habitats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01379.x
- The paper
- Yergeau, E., Newsham, K. K., Pearce, D. A., & Kowalchuk, G. A. (2007). Patterns of bacterial diversity across a range of Antarctic terrestrial habitats. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01379.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.