The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms
Abstract
Summary: Surface‐associated amyloid fibrils have been described by bacteria in the family Enterbacteriaceae , but it is unknown to what extent amyloid adhesins are present in natural biofilms. In this study, amyloid adhesins were specifically stained with Thioflavin T and two conformationally specific antibodies targeting amyloid fibrils. These three independent detection methods were each combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization using fluorescently labelled oligonucleotide probes in order to link phenotype with identity. Escherichia coli mutants with and without amyloid adhesins (curli) served as controls. In biofilms from four different natural habitats, bacteria producing extracellular amyloid adhesins were identified within several phyla: Proteobacteria ( Alpha‐ , Beta‐ , Gamma‐ and Deltaproteobacteria ), Bacteriodetes , Chloroflexi and Actinobacteria , and most likely also in other phyla. Quantification of the microorganisms producing amyloid adhesins showed that they constituted at least 5–40% of all prokaryotes present in the biofilms, depending on the habitat. Particularly in drinking water biofilms, a high number of amyloid‐positive bacteria were identified. Production of amyloids was confirmed by environmental isolates belonging to the Gammaproteobacteria , Bacteriodetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria . The new approach is a very useful tool for further culture‐independent studies in mixed microbial communities, where the abundance and diversity of bacteria expressing amyloid adhesins seems much greater than hitherto anticipated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Claessen, D., Rink, R., de Jong, W., Siebring, J., de Vreugd, P., Boersma, F. G. H., Dijkhuizen, L., & Wösten, H. A. B. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.264303 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPSs) in Ocean Systems
Decho, A. W., & Gutierrez, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00922 · Cited by 733
Chen, S. G., Stribinskis, V., Rane, M. J., Demuth, D. R., Gozal, E., Roberts, A. M., Jagadapillai, R., Liu, R., Choe, K., Shivakumar, B., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34477 · Cited by 463
Miklossy, J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-8-90 · Cited by 355
Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids
Blanco, L. P., Evans, M. L., Smith, D. R., Badtke, M. P., & Chapman, M. R. (2012) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.005 · Cited by 320
Functional amyloid in Pseudomonas
Dueholm, M. S., Petersen, S. V., Sønderkær, M., Larsen, P., Christiansen, G., Hein, K. L., Enghild, J. J., Nielsen, J. L., Nielsen, K. L., Nielsen, P. H., et al. (2010) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07269.x · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, P., Nielsen, J. L., Dueholm, M. S., Wetzel, R., Otzen, D., & Nielsen, P. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3077-3090
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2031382376
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01418.x
- The paper
- Larsen, P., Nielsen, J. L., Dueholm, M. S., Wetzel, R., Otzen, D., & Nielsen, P. H. (2007). Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01418.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.