The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfate‐reducing bacteria in marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark): abundance and diversity related to geochemical zonation
Abstract
Summary: In order to better understand the main factors that influence the distribution of sulfate‐reducing bacteria (SRB), their population size and their metabolic activity in high‐ and low‐sulfate zones, we studied the SRB diversity in 3‐ to 5‐m‐deep sediment cores, which comprised the entire sulfate reduction zone and the upper methanogenic zone. By combining EMA (ethidium monoazide that can only enter damaged/dead cells and may also bind to free DNA) treatment with real‐time PCR, we determined the distributions of total intact bacteria (16S rDNA genes) and intact SRB ( dsrAB gene), their relative population sizes, and the proportion of dead cells or free DNA with depth. The abundance of SRB corresponded in average to 13% of the total bacterial community in the sulfate zone, 22% in the sulfate–methane transition zone and 8% in the methane zone. Compared with the total bacterial community, there were relatively less dead/damaged cells and free DNA present than among the SRB and this fraction did not change systematically with depth. By DGGE analysis, based on the amplification of the dsrA gene (400 bp), we found that the richness of SRB did not change with depth through the geochemical zones; but the clustering was related to the chemical zonation. A full‐length clone library of the dsrAB gene (1900 bp) was constructed from four different depths (20, 110, 280 and 500 cm), and showed that the dsrAB genes in the near‐surface sediment (20 cm) was mainly composed of sequences close to the Desulfobacteraceae , including marine complete and incomplete oxidizers such as Desulfosarcina , Desulfobacterium and Desulfococcus . The three other libraries were predominantly composed of Gram‐positive SRB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands – fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change
Pester, M. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00072 · Cited by 384
Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases
Müller, A. L., Kjeldsen, K. U., Rattei, T., Pester, M., & Loy, A. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.208 · Cited by 381
Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations
Lever, M. A., Rogers, K. L., Lloyd, K. G., Overmann, J., Schink, B., Thauer, R. K., Hoehler, T. M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv020 · Cited by 378
Self-citationA cryptic sulfur cycle driven by iron in the methane zone of marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark)
Holmkvist, L., Ferdelman, T. G., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2011) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.03.033 · Cited by 366
Self-citationRabus, R., Venceslau, S. S., Wöhlbrand, L., Voordouw, G., Wall, J. D., & Pereira, I. A. C. (2015) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/bs.ampbs.2015.05.002 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Leloup, J., Fossing, H., Kohls, K., Holmkvist, L., Borowski, C., & Jørgensen, B. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-24
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1278-1291
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W2151805764
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfate‐reducing bacteria in marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark): abundance and diversity related to geochemical zonation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01855.x
- The paper
- Leloup, J., Fossing, H., Kohls, K., Holmkvist, L., Borowski, C., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2009). Sulfate‐reducing bacteria in marine sediment (Aarhus Bay, Denmark): abundance and diversity related to geochemical zonation. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01855.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.