The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Replicate or lie
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies
Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., & Westcott, S. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 · Cited by 2,112
Fierer, N., Lauber, C. L., Ramirez, K. S., Zaneveld, J., Bradford, M. A., & Knight, R. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.159 · Cited by 1,866
Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome
Shade, A., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x · Cited by 1,245
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Zhou, J., He, Z., Yang, Y., Deng, Y., Tringe, S. G., & Alvarez-Cohen, L. (2015) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02288-14 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Prosser, J. I.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1806-1810
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1922909364
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Replicate or lie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02201.x
- The paper
- Prosser, J. I. (2010). Replicate or lie. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02201.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
