Cited by 124

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Massive dominance of Epsilonproteobacteria in formation waters from a Canadian oil sands reservoir containing severely biodegraded oil

Hubert, Casey R. J., Oldenburg, Thomas B. P., Fustic, Milovan, Gray, Neil D., Larter, Stephen R., Penn, Kevin, Rowan, Arlene K., Seshadri, Rekha, Sherry, Angela, Swainsbury, Richard, Voordouw, Gerrit, Voordouw, Johanna K., Head, Ian M.·2012·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: The subsurface microbiology of an Athabasca oil sands reservoir in western Canada containing severely biodegraded oil was investigated by combining 16S rRNA gene‐ and polar lipid‐based analyses of reservoir formation water with geochemical analyses of the crude oil and formation water. Biomass was filtered from formation water, DNA was extracted using two different methods, and 16S rRNA gene fragments were amplified with several different primer pairs prior to cloning and sequencing or community fingerprinting by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Similar results were obtained irrespective of the DNA extraction method or primers used. Archaeal libraries were dominated by Methanomicrobiales (410 of 414 total sequences formed a dominant phylotype affiliated with a Methanoregula sp.), consistent with the proposed dominant role of CO 2 ‐reducing methanogens in crude oil biodegradation. In two bacterial 16S rRNA clone libraries generated with different primer pairs, > 99% and 100% of the sequences were affiliated with Epsilonproteobacteria ( n = 382 and 72 total clones respectively). This massive dominance of Epsilonproteobacteria sequences was again obtained in a third library (99% of sequences; n = 96 clones) using a third universal bacterial primer pair (inosine‐341f and 1492r). Sequencing of bands from DGGE profiles and intact polar lipid analyses were in accordance with the bacterial clone library results. Epsilonproteobacterial OTUs were affiliated with Sulfuricurvum , Arcobacter and Sulfurospirillum spp. detected in other oil field habitats. The dominant organism revealed by the bacterial libraries (87% of all sequences) is a close relative of Sulfuricurvum kujiense – an organism capable of oxidizing reduced sulfur compounds in crude oil. Geochemical analysis of organic extracts from bitumen at different reservoir depths down to the oil water transition zone of these oil sands indicated active biodegradation of dibenzothiophenes, and stable sulfur isotope ratios for elemental sulfur and sulfate in formation waters were indicative of anaerobic oxidation of sulfur compounds. Microbial desulfurization of crude oil may be an important metabolism for Epsilonproteobacteria indigenous to oil reservoirs with elevated sulfur content and may explain their prevalence in formation waters from highly biodegraded petroleum systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02521.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Geographic location of the Athabasca oil sands. Three formation water samples were taken from around the Muskeg River open pit mine site where unconventional heavy oil recovery operations take place. The approximate location of the Pelican Lake oil reservoir where conventional recovery is practised (Grabowski et al., 2005a,b) is also indicated (P).
Fig 1 Geographic location of the Athabasca oil sands. Three formation water samples were taken from around the Muskeg River open pit mine site where unconventional heavy oil recovery operations take place. The approximate location of the Pelican Lake oil reservoir where conventional recovery is practised (Grabowski et al., 2005a,b) is also indicated (P).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 2 Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments following two-step nested PCR. Amplification with different universal bacterial primers (indicated above gel lanes; see also Table S1) was followed by a second round of amplification using DGGE primers to create amplicons 233 base pairs in length (including a 40-base-pair GC clamp) for DGGE, as described in the text. Arrows indicate bands from lanes 2–3 and 5–6 that were excised and sequenced. All sequences were closely related to the Sulfuricurvum OTU detected in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone libraries.
Fig 2 Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments following two-step nested PCR. Amplification with different universal bacterial primers (indicated above gel lanes; see also Table S1) was followed by a second round of amplification using DGGE primers to create amplicons 233 base pairs in length (including a 40-base-pair GC clamp) for DGGE, as described in the text. Arrows indicate bands from lanes 2–3 and 5–6 that were excised and sequenced. All sequences were closely related to the Sulfuricurvum OTU detected in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene clone libraries.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 3 Neighbour joining phylogenetic tree indicating taxonomic affiliations of cloned archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences from Athabasca oil sands formation waters. For each of the archaeal OTUs the most closely related sequences from GenBank and other related sequences of interest (e.g. from other petroleum reservoirs or methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading systems) are indicated. Bootstrap values next to branching nodes are based on 100 resamplings.
Fig 3 Neighbour joining phylogenetic tree indicating taxonomic affiliations of cloned archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences from Athabasca oil sands formation waters. For each of the archaeal OTUs the most closely related sequences from GenBank and other related sequences of interest (e.g. from other petroleum reservoirs or methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading systems) are indicated. Bootstrap values next to branching nodes are based on 100 resamplings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 4 Neighbour joining phylogenetic tree indicating taxonomic affiliations of cloned bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from Athabasca oil sands formation waters. For each of the bacterial OTUs the most closely related sequences from GenBank and other related sequences of interest (e.g. from other petroleum reservoir habitats) are indicated. Bootstrap values next to branching nodes are based on 100 resamplings.
Fig 4 Neighbour joining phylogenetic tree indicating taxonomic affiliations of cloned bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences from Athabasca oil sands formation waters. For each of the bacterial OTUs the most closely related sequences from GenBank and other related sequences of interest (e.g. from other petroleum reservoir habitats) are indicated. Bootstrap values next to branching nodes are based on 100 resamplings.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 5 Concentrations of dibenzothiophenes (the sum of C0–2-alkyl dibenzothiophenes) in crude oil (white squares) and of C0–5-alkyl naphthalenes in crude oil (black circles) as a function of reservoir depth in Athabasca oil sands at the Muskeg River mine. The profiles are indicative of microbial degradation of crude oil compounds catalysed at the oil water transition zone over geological timescales (Head et al., 2003). Formation waters were obtained from dewatering wells penetrating the basal water leg at c. 80 m depth.
Fig 5 Concentrations of dibenzothiophenes (the sum of C0–2-alkyl dibenzothiophenes) in crude oil (white squares) and of C0–5-alkyl naphthalenes in crude oil (black circles) as a function of reservoir depth in Athabasca oil sands at the Muskeg River mine. The profiles are indicative of microbial degradation of crude oil compounds catalysed at the oil water transition zone over geological timescales (Head et al., 2003). Formation waters were obtained from dewatering wells penetrating the basal water leg at c. 80 m depth.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig 6 Results from 19 published bacterial clone libraries (references are given in B) from subsurface fossil fuel reservoirs were evaluated for the occurrence of dominant taxa. Seven of the habitats were low-temperature environments (reported as < 50°C in situ) as indicated by the dashed line in (A), and 12 were high-temperature oil reservoirs (> 50°C). (A) shows that Epsilonproteobacteria are the third most frequently occurring group overall and were detected in five out of seven low-temperature systems. The abundance of Epsilonproteobacteria in these oil field clone libraries is summarized in (B), which indicates that Epsilonproteobacteria are particularly abundant in low-temperature oil fields in western Canada. The hatched bar indicates the discrepancy in results reported from the Kuji oil storage cavity (Watanabe et al., 2000; 2002) as described in the Introduction.
Fig 6 Results from 19 published bacterial clone libraries (references are given in B) from subsurface fossil fuel reservoirs were evaluated for the occurrence of dominant taxa. Seven of the habitats were low-temperature environments (reported as < 50°C in situ) as indicated by the dashed line in (A), and 12 were high-temperature oil reservoirs (> 50°C). (A) shows that Epsilonproteobacteria are the third most frequently occurring group overall and were detected in five out of seven low-temperature systems. The abundance of Epsilonproteobacteria in these oil field clone libraries is summarized in (B), which indicates that Epsilonproteobacteria are particularly abundant in low-temperature oil fields in western Canada. The hatched bar indicates the discrepancy in results reported from the Kuji oil storage cavity (Watanabe et al., 2000; 2002) as described in the Introduction.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 101

  1. 10.1016/0016-7037(88)90335-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1169984 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1021/ac9910482 · DOI
  5. 10.1139/y59-099 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nature04810 · DOI
  7. Bräuer S.L. Cadillo‐Quiroz H. Ward R.J. Yavitt J.B. andZinder S.H.(2011)Methanoregula booneigen. nov. sp. nov. an acidiphilic methanogen isolated from an acidic peat bog.Int J Syst Appl Microbiol61:45–52. · DOI
  8. 10.1080/01490450903232165 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/AEM.02222-07 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nrmicro1414 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01212.x · DOI
  12. Cole J.R., 2007, The ribosomal database project (RDP‐II): introducing myRDP space and quality controlled public data, Nucleic Acid Res, 35, D169, 10.1093/nar/gkl889 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10482-007-9177-z · DOI
  14. 10.1128/AEM.64.10.3869-3877.1998 · DOI
  15. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.199 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es9013932 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/17.19.7843 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.07.004 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80470-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/AEM.01345-09 · DOI
  21. Fernandez N., 2008, Analysis of Microbial Community during Biofilm Development in an Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Reactor, Mol Ecol, 56, 121
  22. Ficker M., 1999, Molecular characterization of a toluene‐degrading methanogenic consortium, Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 5576, 10.1128/AEM.65.12.5576-5585.1999 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/01490450902724832 · DOI
  24. Fustic M., 2011, Heavy Oil/Bitumen Petroleum Systems in Alberta & Beyond
  25. 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2491-2501.2000 · DOI
  26. 10.1128/AEM.01123-09 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.009 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.03.009 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00792-009-0237-3 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0065-2164(10)72005-0 · DOI
  31. 10.1196/annals.1419.004 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00299-001-0399-7 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01917.x · DOI
  34. 10.1264/jsme2.23.118 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nature02134 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_232 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02077.x · DOI
  38. 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2637-2643.2006 · DOI
  39. 10.1128/AEM.02332-06 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.03.025 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/9781555817589.ch4 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nature06484 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0198-0149(10)80025-1 · DOI
  44. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.107-112.2003 · DOI
  45. 10.1099/ijs.0.63243-0 · DOI
  46. 10.1099/ijs.0.64823-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00813.x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00240-1 · DOI
  49. 10.1306/01270605130 · DOI
  50. 10.2118/08-01-52 · DOI
  51. 10.1128/AEM.54.1.124-129.1988 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00149.x · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00266.x · DOI
  54. 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2679-2690.2006 · DOI
  55. 10.1099/00207713-49-2-545 · DOI
  56. 10.1099/ijs.0.02417-0 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/ismej.2008.25 · DOI
  58. 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7329-7341.2004 · DOI
  59. Marcano N.(2011)Isotopic and molecular studies of biodegraded oils and the development of chemical proxies for monitoring in situ upgrading of bitumen. PhD Thesis. Calgary Canada: University of Calgary.
  60. 10.1128/9781555817589.ch2 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80047-8 · DOI
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001358 · DOI
  63. Nazina T.N., 2006, Phylogenetic diversity and activity of anaerobic microorganisms of high‐temperature horizons of the Dagang oil field (P.R. China), Microbiologiya, 75, 70
  64. 10.1007/s00248-006-9195-9 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.jglr.2010.02.014 · DOI
  66. 10.1021/ac8025515 · DOI
  67. 10.1128/9781555817589.ch5 · DOI
  68. Ollivier B., 1998, Methanocalculus halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from an oil‐producing well, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 48, 821
  69. 10.1128/AEM.66.2.700-711.2000 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01751.x · DOI
  71. 10.1128/AEM.02915-07 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/nar/gkm864 · DOI
  73. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01059.x · DOI
  74. 10.1128/AEM.02835-08 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/BF00406127 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.01.016 · DOI
  77. 10.1007/BF00262203 · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01999.x · DOI
  79. 10.1007/s10482-006-9115-5 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2007.00123.x · DOI
  81. 10.1078/072320203322346173 · DOI
  82. 10.1128/AEM.02341-07 · DOI
  83. Strausz O.P., 2003, The Chemistry of Alberta Oil Sands Bitumens and Heavy Oils
  84. 10.1002/rcm.1378 · DOI
  85. 10.1093/molbev/msm092 · DOI
  86. 10.1128/aem.63.5.1785-1793.1997 · DOI
  87. 10.1128/AEM.66.7.2888-2897.2000 · DOI
  88. 10.1029/98WR00311 · DOI
  89. 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6481-6488.2003 · DOI
  90. Voordouw G., 1990, Distribution of hydrogenase genes in Desulfovibrio spp. and their use in identification of species from the oil field environment, Appl Environ Microbiol, 56, 3748, 10.1128/aem.56.12.3748-3754.1990 · DOI
  91. Voordouw G., 1996, Characterization of 16S rRNA genes from oil field microbial communities indicates the presence of a variety of sulfate‐reducing, fermentative, and sulfide oxidizing bacteria, Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, 1623, 10.1128/aem.62.5.1623-1629.1996 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.08.003 · DOI
  93. 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4803-4809.2000 · DOI
  94. 10.1186/1471-2180-2-23 · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00848.x · DOI
  96. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02023.x · DOI
  97. 10.1128/AEM.01951-07 · DOI
  98. 10.1099/ijs.0.014811-0 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/S0065-2164(08)00806-X · DOI
  100. 10.1038/45777 · DOI
  101. 10.1099/00207713-39-1-10 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Metadata

Authors
Hubert, C. R. J., Oldenburg, T. B. P., Fustic, M., Gray, N. D., Larter, S. R., Penn, K., Rowan, A. K., Seshadri, R., Sherry, A., Swainsbury, R., Voordouw, G., Voordouw, J. K., & Head, I. M.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-08
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
387-404
ISSN
  • 1462-2912
  • 1462-2920
Cited by
124
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review