The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work
Abstract
L'impact relatif de la motivation, des facteurs de personnalité et de la perception de l'ambiance du groupe dans la prédiction de l'innovation individuelle au travail a été mesure dans un échantillon de 435 personnes au cours des trois phases d'une étude longitudinale de 17 mois. L'échantillon comprenait un large éventail de spécialités relevant du service public de santé britannique. Les facteurs de personalité se sont révélés les plus prédictifs alors que le vecu de l'ambiance règnant dans le groupe n'a pas pu rendre compte d'une part significative de la variance. Les résultats laissent supposer que l'innovation dans la conduite professionnelle relève davantage des facteurs de personnalité ou de la créativité personnelle que de la perception des encouragements reçus ou du vécu de l'environnement social. The relative power of personality, motivational, and perceived group climate factors in predicting individual innovation at work was tested in a sample of 435 people, in a three stage longitudinal study (17 months). The research sample included people from a wide range of occupations within the UK National Health Service. Personality factors were most consistent in predicting change in innovation, while perceptions of group climate did not significantly predict any additional variance in individual innovation. The results suggest that individual workrole innovation may be due more to individual personality factors or creativity than to people's perceptions of the supportiveness or otherwise of their social environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations.
Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553 · Cited by 426
Cited by
A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 · Cited by 2,241
Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x · Cited by 1,644
TAKING CHARGE AT WORK: EXTRAROLE EFFORTS TO INITIATE WORKPLACE CHANGE.
Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257011 · Cited by 1,630
Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · Cited by 1,557
Development and Content Validation of a "Hyperdimensional" Taxonomy of Managerial Competence
Tett, R. P., Guterman, H. A., Bleier, A., & Murphy, P. J. (2000) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1303_1 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Bunce, D., & West, M. A.
- Venue
- Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-215
- ISSN
- 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0597
- OpenAlex
- W1971596850
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01076.x
- The paper
- Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work. Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01076.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.