Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned‐Out Employees at Work?

Open access
van Beek, Ilona, Hu, Qiao, Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Taris, Toon W., Schreurs, Bert H.J.·2012·Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Previous research has distinguished between two types of working hard: workaholism, a “bad” type of working hard, and work engagement, a “good” type of working hard. However, the motivations underlying workaholism and work engagement have not been examined extensively. Building on Deci and Ryan's Self‐Determination Theory, the present study examined the motivational correlates of workaholism, work engagement, and burnout (a possible consequence of working hard), using data from Chinese health care professionals (544 nurses and 216 physicians), and controlling for job demands and resources. As expected, structural equation modeling revealed that high levels of workaholism were associated with high levels of introjected regulation and identified regulation; that high levels of work engagement were mainly associated with high levels of intrinsic regulation; and that high levels of burnout were mainly associated with low levels of intrinsic regulation. Thus, different types of motivational regulation are associated with different types of job‐related well‐being.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Arbuckle J.L., 2007, AMOS 16.0 (Computer Software)
  2. Byrne B.M., 2009, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, programming, and applications
  3. Frese M., 2008, An introduction to work and organizational psychology, 397
  4. Koestner R., 2002, Handbook of self‐determination research, 101
  5. 10.4337/9781847202833.00013 · doi:10.4337/9781847202833.00013
  6. 10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.70 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1023/A:1009581330960 · doi:10.1023/a:1009581330960
  8. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68 · Paper page
  9. Schaufeli W.B., 2007, Research in social issues in management, 135

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
van Beek, I., Hu, Q., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, B. H. J.
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-05
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
30-55
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
DOI
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x
OpenAlex
W1902960554
Cited by
390
References
67
FWCI
23.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned‐Out Employees at Work? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x
The paper
van Beek, I., Hu, Q., Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, B. H. J. (2012). For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned‐Out Employees at Work? Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.