The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Urinary symptoms in the community: how bothersome are they?
Abstract
Objectives To measure the level of reported urinary symptoms presumed to be associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) among men aged 40 years and over in the community, and to assess how bothersome these symptoms are perceived to be. Subjects and methods All ambulant men aged 40 years and over who were registered in a general practice (703) were invited to attend the health centre to complete a questionnaire containing the Maine prostatectomy scale and the International Continence Society‐BPH questionnaire, and to undergo uroflowmetry. Results The prevalence of symptomatic BPH (as defined by a numerical score ≥11 on the Maine score, a urinary peak flow of<15 ml/s and failure to void ≥ 150 ml on three separate occasions) was 284/1000 for men aged 40 years and over. This prevalence increased from 179/1000 in men aged 40–49 to 500/1000 in men aged 70 years and over. The most commonly reported symptoms were those typically associated with BPH (terminal dribble, hesitancy, intermittency, urgency). The symptoms that caused men the greatest degree of bother were frequency, nocturia and those causing incontinence or social embarassment. Conclusion The high prevalence of urinary symptoms assumed to be related to BPH in men in the community does not necessarily suggest that these men will require treatment. Common symptoms, typically associated with BPH, were tolerated. Further research is required to investigate the natural history of urinary symptoms, the relationships between symptoms and baldder outflow obstruction secondary to BPH, and to determine the most appropriate management for men in the community, raging from ‘watchful waiting’ (monitoring without treatment) to medical or surgical treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peters, T. J., Donovan, J. L., Kay, H. E., Abrams, P., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., Porru, D., & Thuroff, J. W. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65075-4 · Cited by 313
Self-citationPrevalence of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of population-based studies
Prins, J., Blanker, M. H., Bohnen, A. M., Thomas, S., & Bosch, J. L. H. R. (2002) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900905 · Cited by 279
Smolensky, M. H., Hermida, R. C., Reinberg, A., Sackett-Lundeen, L., & Portaluppi, F. (2016) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1080/07420528.2016.1184678 · Cited by 197
Cross-sectional study of nocturia in both sexes: analysis of a voluntary health screening project
Schatzl, G., Temml, C., Schmidbauer, J., Dolezal, B., Haidinger, G., & Madersbacher, S. (2000) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00603-8 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- JOLLEYS, J. V., DONOVAN, J. L., NANACHAHAL, K., PETERS, T. J., & ABRAMS, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Urology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 551-555
- ISSN
- 0007-1331 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108409745
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary symptoms in the community: how bothersome are they? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb09182.x
- The paper
- JOLLEYS, J. V., DONOVAN, J. L., NANACHAHAL, K., PETERS, T. J., & ABRAMS, P. (1994). Urinary symptoms in the community: how bothersome are they? British Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb09182.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.