Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 807

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study

Open access
Coyne, Karin S., Sexton, Chris C., Thompson, Christine L., Milsom, Ian, Irwin, Debra, Kopp, Zoe S., Chapple, Christopher R., Kaplan, Steven, Tubaro, Andrea, Aiyer, Lalitha P., Wein, Alan J.·2009·BJU International

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the prevalence and associated bother of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the general populations of the USA, UK and Sweden using current International Continence Society (ICS) definitions, as no previous population‐based studies evaluating the prevalence of LUTS in the USA, using the 2002 ICS definitions, have been conducted. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross‐sectional, population‐representative survey was conducted via the Internet in the USA, the UK and Sweden. Members of Internet‐based panels were randomly selected to receive an e‐mailed invitation to participate. If interested, respondents selected a link to an informed consent page, followed by the survey. Participants were asked to rate how often they experienced individual LUTS during the previous 4 weeks, on a five‐point Likert scale, and, if experienced, how much the symptom bothered them. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and present the data. RESULTS: Responses rates for the USA, the UK and Sweden were 59.6%, 60.6% and 52.3%, respectively, with a final sample of 30 000 (USA 20 000; UK 7500; Sweden 2500). The mean age (range) of the participants was 56.6 (40–99) years; the mean percentages for race were 82.9% white, 6.7% black, 6.0% Hispanic and 4.4% Asian/other. The prevalence of LUTS was defined by two symptom frequency thresholds, i.e. at least ‘sometimes’ and at least ‘often’ for all LUTS except incontinence, where frequency thresholds were at least ‘a few times per month’ and at least ‘a few times per week’. The prevalence of at least one LUTS at least ‘sometimes’ was 72.3% for men and 76.3% for women, and 47.9% and 52.5% for at least ‘often’ for men and women, respectively. For most LUTS, at least half of the participants were bothered ‘somewhat’ or more using a frequency threshold of at least ‘sometimes’. For a threshold of at least ‘often’, ‘somewhat’ or more bother was reported by ≥70% of participants except for terminal dribble in men and split stream in women. CONCLUSION: In this large population study of three countries, LUTS are highly prevalent among men and women aged >40 years. In general, LUTS experienced ‘often’ or more are bothersome to most people.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08427.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 807

Metadata

Authors
Coyne, K. S., Sexton, C. C., Thompson, C. L., Milsom, I., Irwin, D., Kopp, Z. S., Chapple, C. R., Kaplan, S., Tubaro, A., Aiyer, L. P., & Wein, A. J.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-09
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
352-360
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W2051893541
Cited by
807
References
3
FWCI
26.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08427.x
The paper
Coyne, K. S., Sexton, C. C., Thompson, C. L., Milsom, I., Irwin, D., Kopp, Z. S., Chapple, C. R., Kaplan, S., Tubaro, A., Aiyer, L. P., & Wein, A. J. (2009). The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08427.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.