Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient‐reported reasons for discontinuing overactive bladder medication

Open access
Benner, Joshua S., Nichol, Michael B., Rovner, Eric S., Jumadilova, Zhanna, Alvir, Jose, Hussein, Mohamed, Fanning, Kristina, Trocio, Jeffrey N., Brubaker, Linda·2010·BJU International

Abstract

Study Type – Symptom prevalence (prospective cohort) Level of Evidence 1b OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient‐reported reasons for discontinuing antimuscarinic prescription medications for overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase 1 screening survey was sent to a representative sample of 260 000 households in the USA to identify patients using antimuscarinic agents for OAB. A detailed phase‐2 follow‐up survey was sent to 6577 respondents with one or more antimuscarinic prescriptions for OAB in the 12 months before the phase 1 survey. The follow‐up survey included questions about demographics, clinical characteristics, antimuscarinic use, beliefs about OAB, treatment expectations, OAB symptom bother, and pre‐coded reasons for discontinuation. Patients who reported discontinuing one or more OAB medication during the 12 months before phase 2 were grouped by reason, using latent class analysis (LCA); the Lo‐Mendell‐Rubin likelihood statistical test was used to determine the number of classes. Conditional probabilities of reasons for discontinuation were calculated for each class. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on class assignment. RESULTS: In all, 162 906 (63%) and 5392 (82%) useable responses were returned in phases 1 and 2, respectively; the demographics were similar in respondents and nonrespondents in both phases. In all, 1322 phase 2 respondents (24.5%) reported discontinuing one or more antimuscarinic drugs during the 12 months before phase 2. LCA identified two classes (Lo‐Mendell‐Rubin statistic, P = 0.01) based on reasons for discontinuation. Most respondents (89%) reported discontinuing OAB medication primarily due to unmet treatment expectations and/or tolerability; many respondents in this class switched to a new antimuscarinic agent. A smaller group (11%) indicated a general aversion to taking medication. Age, sex, race, income, and history of incontinence were not predictive of class assignment. CONCLUSIONS: Expectations about treatment efficacy and side‐effects are the most important considerations in discontinuing OAB medications for most patients. Interventions to promote realistic expectations about treatment efficacy and side‐effects might enhance adherence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09036.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Benner, J. S., Nichol, M. B., Rovner, E. S., Jumadilova, Z., Alvir, J., Hussein, M., Fanning, K., Trocio, J. N., & Brubaker, L.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-09
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
1276-1282
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W1972477468
Cited by
392
References
2
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient‐reported reasons for discontinuing overactive bladder medication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09036.x
The paper
Benner, J. S., Nichol, M. B., Rovner, E. S., Jumadilova, Z., Alvir, J., Hussein, M., Fanning, K., Trocio, J. N., & Brubaker, L. (2010). Patient‐reported reasons for discontinuing overactive bladder medication. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09036.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.