The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head‐to‐head placebo‐controlled trial
Abstract
Study Type – Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine 8 mg with tolterodine extended‐release (ER) 4 mg and placebo in a randomized clinical trial of patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 12‐week double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐controlled, randomized clinical trial, eligible patients reported OAB symptoms for ≥3 months and recorded ≥8 voids and ≥1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode per 24 h in 3‐day bladder diaries at baseline. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week then 8 mg for 11 weeks); tolterodine ER 4 mg; or placebo (with sham dose escalation for tolterodine ER and placebo). Endpoints were changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint), total and nocturnal voids, urgency episodes, severe urgency episodes, and frequency‐urgency sum per 24 h; mean voided volume per void (MVV); and the OAB questionnaire (OAB‐q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). Safety and tolerability were assessed and summarized over the 12‐week study period. RESULTS: Fesoterodine (636 patients) significantly improved UUI episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) compared with tolterodine ER (641 patients; P = 0.017) and placebo (313 patients; P < 0.001). Fesoterodine also produced significantly greater improvements than tolterodine ER in MVV ( P = 0.005). Fesoterodine significantly improved all diary endpoints compared with placebo ( P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids ( P = 0.327). Tolterodine ER significantly improved all diary endpoints vs placebo ( P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids ( P = 0.506) and MVV ( P = 0.103). Diary dry rates (the proportion of patients reporting no UUI episodes at endpoint among those with one or more UUI episodes at baseline) were significantly higher with fesoterodine (64%) than with tolterodine ER (57%; P = 0.015) and placebo (45%; P < 0.001). Improvements in PPBC, UPS and OAB‐q scale and domain scores at week 12 were all significantly better with fesoterodine than placebo (all P < 0.001) and tolterodine ER (all P < 0.05) except for the OAB‐q Sleep domain vs tolterodine ER ( P = 0.081). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 5% in the fesoterodine group, 16% and 4% in the tolterodine ER group, and 6% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment‐emergent adverse events were 6%, 4% and 2% in the fesoterodine, tolterodine ER, and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with OAB, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superior efficacy over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo in reducing UUI episodes (primary endpoint) and in improving most patient‐reported outcome measures. Both active treatments were well tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coyne, K. S., Tubaro, A., Brubaker, L., & Bavendam, T. (2006) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.042 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline
Gormley, E. A., Lightner, D. J., Burgio, K. L., Chai, T. C., Clemens, J. Q., Culkin, D. J., Das, A. K., Foster, H. E., Scarpero, H. M., Tessier, C. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.079 · Cited by 710
EAU Guidelines on Assessment and Nonsurgical Management of Urinary Incontinence
Lucas, M. G., Bosch, R. J. L., Burkhard, F. C., Cruz, F., Madden, T. B., Nambiar, A. K., Neisius, A., de Ridder, D. J. M. K., Tubaro, A., Turner, W. H., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.047 · Cited by 422
Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial of Mirabegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder
Nitti, V. W., Auerbach, S., Martin, N., Calhoun, A., Lee, M., & Herschorn, S. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017 · Cited by 375
Self-citationWolff, A., Joshi, R. K., Ekström, J., Aframian, D., Pedersen, A. M. L., Proctor, G., Narayana, N., Villa, A., Sia, Y. W., Aliko, A., et al. (2017) · Drugs in R&D · doi:10.1007/s40268-016-0153-9 · Cited by 364
Maman, K., Aballea, S., Nazir, J., Desroziers, K., Neine, M.-E., Siddiqui, E., Odeyemi, I., & Hakimi, Z. (2014) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.010 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Herschorn, S., Swift, S., Guan, Z., Carlsson, M., Morrow, J. D., Brodsky, M., & Gong, J.
- Venue
- BJU International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-16
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-66
- ISSN
- 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-410X
- OpenAlex
- W1531562711
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head‐to‐head placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09086.x
- The paper
- Herschorn, S., Swift, S., Guan, Z., Carlsson, M., Morrow, J. D., Brodsky, M., & Gong, J. (2010). Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head‐to‐head placebo‐controlled trial. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.09086.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.