Cited by 20Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Assessing the Impact of Blood Sample Type on the Estimated Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Diabetes Mellitus in Epidemiological Surveys

Abstract

In a prospective study of 353 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 3 months and 12 months after surgery. Venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose samples were assayed on a bench-top analyser. The World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus were applied to venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose measurements. The difference between the plasma and whole blood concentration of glucose was 0.79-0.86 mmol l-1 at a plasma glucose of 7.8 mmol l-1 and 1.22-1.24 mmol l-1 at a plasma glucose of 11.1 mmol l-1 (compared to 1.1 mmol l-1 by World Health Organization criteria at both cut-points). Despite this, in our subject population with a high prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (20.3% at 3 months, 15.3% at 12 months) and diabetes mellitus (10.1% at 3 months and 12 months), there was no significant difference in the proportion classified impaired glucose tolerance or having diabetes mellitus using venous whole blood glucose compared to venous plasma glucose. We conclude that despite the minor anomaly between WHO diagnostic criteria based on venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose measurements, these criteria are robust and give broadly comparable population prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance irrespective of blood sample choice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00486.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 12 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.2337/diab.28.12.1039 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Niejadlik DC, 1974, The glucose tolerance test: An evaluation, Postgrad Med, 55, 73, 10.1080/00325481.1974.11713783 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01558.x · DOI
  4. 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.832 · DOI
  5. Fuller JH, 1980, Coronary‐heart‐disease‐risk and impaired glucose tolerance: the Whitehall study, Lancet, 1374
  6. 10.1007/BF00423146 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00254832 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)92274-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.295.6610.1363 · DOI
  10. 10.1136/bmj.301.6749.397 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Farrer, M., Albers, C. J., Neil, H. A. W., Adams, P. C., Laker, M. F., & Alberti, K. G. M. M.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Farrer, M.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
325-329
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2020591989
Cited by
20
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, venous plasma glucose, WHO diagnostic criteria, oral glucose tolerance test, coronary artery bypass grafting, prevalence estimation, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Bypass, Autoanalysis, Blood Glucose, Blood Specimen Collection, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Time Factors, Veins, Prevalence, Glucose Intolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review