The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh
Abstract
Aims To describe differences in prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with its associated risk factors between rural and urban populations in Bangladesh. Diagnostic criteria [fasting blood glucose (FBG) and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT)] were compared and reviewed for both populations. Methods A total of 1555 subjects from urban and 4757 from rural communities (age ≥ 20 years) with similar cultural and ethnic backgrounds were randomly selected in a cross‐sectional survey. FBG values were determined from all and 2‐h post‐glucose capillary blood samples were determined after a 75‐g oral glucose load for a selected number (urban 476, rural 1046). Results A higher prevalence of diabetes was found in urban (8.1%) compared with rural populations (2.3%). Age, sex and waist‐to‐hip ratio for men were significant risk factors for both urban and rural subjects following fasting and 2‐h post‐glucose values adjusted for a number of confounding variables. Poor agreement was observed between FBG and OGTT for both urban (kappa 0.41) and rural (kappa 0.40) areas. Conclusions A higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the urban population was observed compared with rural subjects despite similar body mass indexes (BMI). Differences in obesity, waist/hip ratio or hypertension failed to explain the increasing occurrence of T2DM in the urban population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Estimates for Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Adults
King, H., Rewers, M., & Who Ad Hoc Diabetes Reporting Group (1993) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.16.1.157 · Cited by 886
Racial Differences in the Relation between Blood Pressure and Insulin Resistance
Saad, M. F., Lillioja, S., Nyomba, B. L., Castillo, C., Ferraro, R., De Gregorio, M., Ravussin, E., Knowler, W. C., Bennett, P. H., Howard, B. V., et al. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199103143241105 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
Diabetes in Asia: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Pathophysiology
Chan, J. C. N., Malik, V., Jia, W., Kadowaki, T., Yajnik, C. S., Yoon, K.-H., & Hu, F. B. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.726 · Cited by 1,997
Ramachandran, A., Wan Ma, R. C., & Snehalatha, C. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60937-5 · Cited by 782
Trends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries
Ramachandran, A. (2012) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v3.i6.110 · Cited by 561
Zaman, M., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. R., Bhuiyan, M., Karim, M. N., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2016) · Indian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.4103/0019-557x.177290 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussain, A., Rahim, M. A., Azad Khan, A. K., Ali, S. M. K., & Vaaler, S.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-23
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 931-936
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2073169931
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01558.x
- The paper
- Hussain, A., Rahim, M. A., Azad Khan, A. K., Ali, S. M. K., & Vaaler, S. (2005). Type 2 diabetes in rural and urban population: diverse prevalence and associated risk factors in Bangladesh. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01558.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.