Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence and projections of diabetes and pre‐diabetes in adults in Sri Lanka—Sri Lanka Diabetes, Cardiovascular Study (SLDCS)

Katulanda, P., Constantine, G. R., Mahesh, J. G., Sheriff, R., Seneviratne, R. D. A., Wijeratne, S., Wijesuriya, M., McCarthy, M. I., Adler, A. I., Matthews, D. R.·2008·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims To determine the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and pre‐diabetes (impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance) in adults in Sri Lanka. Projections for the year 2030 and factors associated with diabetes and pre‐diabetes are also presented. Methods This cross‐sectional study was conducted between 2005 and 2006. A nationally representative sample of 5000 adults aged ≥ 18 years was selected by a multi‐stage random cluster sampling technique. Fasting plasma glucose was tested in all participants and a 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test was performed in non‐diabetic subjects. Prevalence was estimated for those > 20 years of age. Results Response rate was 91% (n = 4532), males 40%, age 46.1 ± 15.1 years (mean ± standard deviation). The age–sex standardized prevalence (95% confidence interval) of diabetes for Sri Lankans aged ≥ 20 years was 10.3% (9.4–11.2%) [males 9.8% (8.4–11.2%), females 10.9% (9.7–12.1%), P = 0.129). Thirty‐six per cent (31.9–40.1%) of all diabetic subjects were previously undiagnosed. Diabetes prevalence was higher in the urban population compared with rural [16.4% (13.8–19.0%) vs. 8.7% (7.8–9.6%); P < 0.001]. The prevalence of overall, urban and rural pre‐diabetes was 11.5% (10.5–12.5%), 13.6% (11.2–16.0%) and 11.0% (10.0–12.0%), respectively. Overall, 21.8% (20.5–23.1%) had some form of dysglycaemia. The projected diabetes prevalence for the year 2030 is 13.9%. Those with diabetes and pre‐diabetes compared with normal glucose tolerance were older, physically inactive, frequently lived in urban areas and had a family history of diabetes. They had higher body mass index, waist circumference, waist–hip ratio, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Insulin was prescribed to 4.4% (2.7–6.1%) of all diabetic subjects. Conclusions One in five adults in Sri Lanka has either diabetes or pre‐diabetes and one‐third of those with diabetes are undiagnosed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02523.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Katulanda, P., Constantine, G. R., Mahesh, J. G., Sheriff, R., Seneviratne, R. D. A., Wijeratne, S., Wijesuriya, M., McCarthy, M. I., Adler, A. I., & Matthews, D. R.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-29
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1062-1069
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W1555322723
Cited by
287
References
0
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and projections of diabetes and pre‐diabetes in adults in Sri Lanka—Sri Lanka Diabetes, Cardiovascular Study (SLDCS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02523.x
The paper
Katulanda, P., Constantine, G. R., Mahesh, J. G., Sheriff, R., Seneviratne, R. D. A., Wijeratne, S., Wijesuriya, M., McCarthy, M. I., Adler, A. I., & Matthews, D. R. (2008). Prevalence and projections of diabetes and pre‐diabetes in adults in Sri Lanka—Sri Lanka Diabetes, Cardiovascular Study (SLDCS). Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02523.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.