Self-monitoring of blood glucose changed non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients' beliefs about diabetes and self-monitoring in a randomized trial
Abstract
AIMS: To determine whether differences in beliefs about diabetes and its treatment resulted from different intensities of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in non-insulin treated patients with Type 2 diabetes in the Diabetes Glycaemic Education and Monitoring (DiGEM) trial. METHODS: Patients (n = 453) were randomized to usual care, less-intensive SMBG and more intensive SMBG. Beliefs about diabetes were measured with a standard questionnaire (the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire; IPQ-R). Changes in beliefs were analysed using analysis of covariance (ancova) with adjustment for baseline values. Mediation analyses assessed whether differences in behavioural outcomes between groups could be attributed to differences in beliefs. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 339 patients (74.8%). Respondents were mean (+/- sd) age 65.9 +/- 10 years and with diabetes duration of 4.8 +/- 4.7 years (median 36, range 1-384 months). Concerns about the consequences of diabetes increased in both self-monitoring groups, relative to control subjects [P = 0.004; Cohen's d standardized effect size = 0.19 less intensive and d = 0.36 more intensive monitoring]. No other beliefs about diabetes differed between groups. Beliefs about the importance of self-testing increased in both self-monitoring groups relative to the usual-care group (P < 0.001; d = 0.57 less intensive and d = 0.63 more intensive monitoring). Changes in psychological well-being did not differ between groups, but control patients reported greater increases in general (P = 0.014) and specific (P < 0.001) dietary adherence than did patients in the self-monitoring groups. These outcomes were not mediated by intervention-related changes in beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite changes in some beliefs about diabetes differing between groups there were no corresponding changes in self-reported health behaviours. This suggests that changes in illness beliefs resulting from SMBG do not cause changes in diabetes-related health behaviours.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No change was observed in physical activity or medication-taking in either of the two RCTs measuring those behaviors.
“while no change was observed in physical activity or medication-taking in either study (51, 57).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- French, D. P., Wade, A. N., Yudkin, P., Neil, H. A. W., Kinmonth, A. L., & Farmer, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Coventry University (GB)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Primary Health Care (QA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- French, D. P.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1218-1228
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W1972583027
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- self-monitoring of blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, non-insulin-treated diabetes, illness perception, dietary adherence, psychological well-being, health behavior change
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Culture, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review