The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationship of Type 2 diabetes to the prevalence, incidence and progression of age‐related hearing loss
Abstract
Aims Type 2 diabetes and associated microvascular abnormalities are postulated to affect hearing. Our study reports on the relationship between Type 2 diabetes and the prevalence, 5‐year incidence and progression of hearing impairment in a representative, older, Australian population. Methods The Blue Mountains Hearing Study is a population‐based survey of age‐related hearing loss conducted in a defined suburban area, west of Sydney. Hearing loss was defined as the pure‐tone average of frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz > 25 decibels hearing level (dB HL) in the better ear (bilateral hearing loss). Type 2 diabetes was defined from reported physician‐diagnosed diabetes or fasting blood glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l. Results Age‐related hearing loss was present in 50.0% of diabetic participants (n = 210) compared with 38.2% of non‐diabetic participants (n = 1648), odds ratio (OR) 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–2.17], after adjusting for multiple risk factors. A relationship of diabetes duration with hearing loss was also demonstrated. After 5 years, incident hearing loss occurred in 18.7% of participants with, and 18.0% of those without diabetes, adjusted OR 1.01 (CI 0.54–1.91). Progression of existing hearing loss (> 5 dB HL), however, was significantly greater in participants with newly diagnosed diabetes (69.6%) than in those without diabetes (47.8%) over this period, adjusted OR 2.71 (CI 1.07–6.86). Conclusions Type 2 diabetes was associated with prevalent, but not incident hearing loss in this older population. Accelerated hearing loss progression over 5 years was more than doubled in persons newly diagnosed with diabetes. These data explore further reported links between Type 2 diabetes and age‐related hearing loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bowl, M. R., & Dawson, S. J. (2019) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a033217 · Cited by 396
Mick, P., Reed, M., & Pichora-Fuller, M. (2015) · Seminars in Hearing · doi:10.1055/s-0035-1555116 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, P., Gopinath, B., McMahon, C. M., Rochtchina, E., Wang, J. J., Boyages, S. C., & Leeder, S. R.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 483-488
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2145535053
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship of Type 2 diabetes to the prevalence, incidence and progression of age‐related hearing loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02710.x
- The paper
- Mitchell, P., Gopinath, B., McMahon, C. M., Rochtchina, E., Wang, J. J., Boyages, S. C., & Leeder, S. R. (2009). Relationship of Type 2 diabetes to the prevalence, incidence and progression of age‐related hearing loss. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02710.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.