Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed

Owings, T. M., Apelqvist, J., Stenström, A., Becker, M., Bus, S. A., Kalpen, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., Cavanagh, P. R.·2009·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims The recurrence of foot ulcers is a significant problem in people with diabetic neuropathy. The purpose of this study was to measure in‐shoe plantar pressures and other characteristics in a group of neuropathic patients with diabetes who had prior foot ulcers which had remained healed. Methods This was an epidemiological cohort study of patients from diabetes clinics of two Swedish hospitals. From a database of 2625 eligible patients, 190 surviving patients with prior plantar ulcers of the forefoot (hallux or metatarsal heads) caused by repetitive stress were identified and 49 patients agreed to participate. Barefoot and in‐shoe plantar pressures were measured during walking. Data on foot deformity, activity profiles and self‐reported behaviour were also collected. Results Mean barefoot plantar peak pressure at the prior ulcer site (556 kPa) was lower than in other published series, although the range was large (107–1192 kPa). Mean in‐shoe peak pressure at this location averaged 207 kPa when measured with an insole sensor. Barefoot peak pressure only predicted ∼35% of the variance of in‐shoe peak pressure, indicating variation in the efficacy of the individual footwear prescriptions (primarily extra‐depth shoes with custom insoles). Conclusions We propose that the mean value for in‐shoe pressures reported in these patients be used as a target in footwear prescription for patients with prior ulcers. Although plantar pressure is only one factor in a multifaceted strategy to prevent ulcer recurrence, the quantitative focus on pressure reduction in footwear is likely to have beneficial effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02835.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Owings, T. M., Apelqvist, J., Stenström, A., Becker, M., Bus, S. A., Kalpen, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., & Cavanagh, P. R.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
1141-1146
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2104329837
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02835.x
The paper
Owings, T. M., Apelqvist, J., Stenström, A., Becker, M., Bus, S. A., Kalpen, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., & Cavanagh, P. R. (2009). Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02835.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.