The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed
Abstract
Aims The recurrence of foot ulcers is a significant problem in people with diabetic neuropathy. The purpose of this study was to measure in‐shoe plantar pressures and other characteristics in a group of neuropathic patients with diabetes who had prior foot ulcers which had remained healed. Methods This was an epidemiological cohort study of patients from diabetes clinics of two Swedish hospitals. From a database of 2625 eligible patients, 190 surviving patients with prior plantar ulcers of the forefoot (hallux or metatarsal heads) caused by repetitive stress were identified and 49 patients agreed to participate. Barefoot and in‐shoe plantar pressures were measured during walking. Data on foot deformity, activity profiles and self‐reported behaviour were also collected. Results Mean barefoot plantar peak pressure at the prior ulcer site (556 kPa) was lower than in other published series, although the range was large (107–1192 kPa). Mean in‐shoe peak pressure at this location averaged 207 kPa when measured with an insole sensor. Barefoot peak pressure only predicted ∼35% of the variance of in‐shoe peak pressure, indicating variation in the efficacy of the individual footwear prescriptions (primarily extra‐depth shoes with custom insoles). Conclusions We propose that the mean value for in‐shoe pressures reported in these patients be used as a target in footwear prescription for patients with prior ulcers. Although plantar pressure is only one factor in a multifaceted strategy to prevent ulcer recurrence, the quantitative focus on pressure reduction in footwear is likely to have beneficial effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeMaster, J. W., Mueller, M. J., Reiber, G. E., Mehr, D. R., Madsen, R. W., & Conn, V. S. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080019 · Cited by 179
Daily weight-bearing activity does not increase the risk of diabetic foot ulcers
LEMASTER, J. W., REIBER, G. E., SMITH, D. G., HEAGERTY, P. J., & WALLACE, C. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000074459.41029.75 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Bus, S. A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Raspovic, A., Sacco, I. C. N., van Netten, J. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3269 · Cited by 517
Self-citationEffect of Custom-Made Footwear on Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetes
Bus, S. A., Waaijman, R., Arts, M., de Haart, M., Busch-Westbroek, T., van Baal, J., & Nollet, F. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-0996 · Cited by 317
Self-citationThe role of pressure offloading on diabetic foot ulcer healing and prevention of recurrence.
Bus, S. A. (2016) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000002686 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Owings, T. M., Apelqvist, J., Stenström, A., Becker, M., Bus, S. A., Kalpen, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., & Cavanagh, P. R.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1141-1146
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2104329837
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02835.x
- The paper
- Owings, T. M., Apelqvist, J., Stenström, A., Becker, M., Bus, S. A., Kalpen, A., Ulbrecht, J. S., & Cavanagh, P. R. (2009). Plantar pressures in diabetic patients with foot ulcers which have remained healed. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02835.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.