Resistant Starch Improves Insulin Sensitivity in Metabolic Syndrome
Abstract
Aims Diets rich in non-viscous fibre are linked to a reduced risk of both diabetes and cardiovascular disease; however, the mechanism of action remains unclear. This study was undertaken to assess whether chronic consumption of this type of fibre in individuals with the metabolic syndrome would improve insulin sensitivity via changes in ectopic fat storage. Methods The study was a single-blind, randomized, parallel nutritional intervention where 20 insulin resistant subjects consumed either the fibre supplement (resistant starch) (40 g/day) or placebo supplement (0 g/day) for 12 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was measured by euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp and ectopic fat storage measured by whole-body magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Results Resistant starch consumption did not significantly affect body weight, fat storage in muscle, liver or visceral depots. There was also no change with resistant starch feeding on vascular function or markers of inflammation. However, in subjects randomized to consume the resistant starch, insulin sensitivity improved compared with the placebo group (P = 0.023). Insulin sensitivity correlated significantly with changes in waist circumference and fat storage in tibialis muscle and to a lesser extent to visceral-to-subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue ratio. Conclusion Consumption of resistant starch improves insulin sensitivity in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Unlike in animal models, diabetes prevention does not appear to be direc…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changing some of the digestible starch into RS may decrease the GI and have a positive effect on postprandial glycemia.
“as changing some of the digestible starch into RS may decrease the GI and have a positive effect on postprandial glycemia [15,16].”
From The Effect of Cooking and Cooling Chickpea Pasta on Resistant Starch Content, Glycemic Response, and Glycemic Index in Healthy Adults (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 259
- Authors
- Johnston, K. L., Thomas, E. L., Bell, J. D., Frost, G. S., & Robertson, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Robertson, M. D.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-397
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2119910609
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-01-20)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- resistant starch, insulin sensitivity, metabolic syndrome, visceral adipose tissue, waist circumference, vascular function, inflammation, diabetes prevention
- MeSH terms
- Body Weight, Dietary Fiber, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Glucose Clamp Technique, Metabolic Syndrome, Body Fat Distribution, Lipid Metabolism, Waist Circumference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review