Cited by 64Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patient‐reported outcomes following islet cell or pancreas transplantation (alone or after kidney) in Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review

Open access
Speight, J., Reaney, M. D., Woodcock, A. J., Smith, R. M., Shaw, J. A. M.·2010·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims For selected individuals with complex Type 1 diabetes, pancreatic islet transplantation (IT) offers the potential of excellent glycaemic control without significant hypoglycaemia, balanced by the need for ongoing systemic immunosuppression. Increasingly, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered alongside biomedical outcomes as a measure of transplant success. PROs in IT have not previously been compared directly with the closest alternate treatment option, pancreas transplant alone (PTA) or pancreas after kidney (PAK). Methods We used a Population, Intervention, Comparisons, Outcomes (PICO) strategy to search Scopus and screened 314 references for inclusion. Results Twelve studies [including PRO assessment of PAK, PTA, islet-after kidney (IAK) and islet transplant alone (ITA); n = 7-205] used a total of nine specified and two unspecified PRO measures. Results were mixed but identified some benefits which remained apparent up to 36 months post-transplant, including improvements in fear of hypoglycaemia, as well as some aspects of diabetes-specific quality of life (QoL) and general health status. Negative outcomes included short-term pain associated with the procedure, immunosuppressant side effects and depressed mood associated with loss of graft function. Conclusions The mixed results may be attributable to limited sample sizes. Also, some PRO measures may lack sensitivity to detect actual changes, as they exclude issues and domains of life likely to be important…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03029.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511543579.246 · DOI
  2. Piper M, 2004, Islet Transplantation in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  3. 10.1126/science.306.5693.34 · DOI
  4. 10.2337/diacare.23.1.112 · DOI
  5. 10.1056/NEJM200007273430401 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s11892-008-0057-3 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/01.mot.0000163355.12317.37 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/01.TP.0000160816.21799.F5 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02731.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00676-6 · DOI
  11. Illner WD, 1995, Duct occlusion‐induced vascularized islet grafts are not associated with progressive long‐term dysfunction, Transplant Proc, 27, 1342
  12. 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.09.008 · DOI
  13. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318166a27b · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01174.x · DOI
  15. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818a7f45 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/01.tp.0000187881.97068.77 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.01.001 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/01.tp.0000280550.01028.89 · DOI
  20. Endicott J, 1993, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure, Psychopharmacol Bull, 29, 321
  21. 10.2337/diacare.11.9.725 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Radosenick DM, 1994, Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) 2.0 Scoring Comparisons and Reference Data
  25. Feeny D, 1996, Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials
  26. 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.3.187 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1348/135910702320645381 · DOI
  29. Speight J, 2009, Expectations and experiences of transplant: a qualitative study of people with Type 1 diabetes undergoing pancreatic islet transplantation, Diabet Med, 24, S189

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Speight, J., Reaney, M. D., Woodcock, A. J., Smith, R. M., & Shaw, J. A. M.
Affiliations
  • Advocates for Human Potential (United States) (US)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Speight, J.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
812-822
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2167968923
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Diabetes UK
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation, pancreas transplantation, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, fear of hypoglycemia, immunosuppressive drug adverse effects, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Graft Survival, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Quality of Life, Kidney Transplantation, Pancreas Transplantation, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review