Cited by 56Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Education

The Pre-diabetes Risk Education and Physical Activity Recommendation and Encouragement (PREPARE) programme study: are improvements in glucose regulation sustained at 2 years?: Long-term evaluation of PREPARE

Yates, T., Davies, M. J., Sehmi, S., Gorely, T., Khunti, K.·2011·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine whether improvements in glucose regulation following the PREPARE structured education programme were sustained at 24 months. Patients and methods Ninety-eight overweight or obese individuals with impaired glucose tolerance were randomized to receive: (1) advice leaflet, (2) 3-h structured education programme aimed at promoting physical activity, (iii) 3-h structured education with personalized pedometer use. The primary outcome was change in 2-h post-challenge plasma glucose. Results Seventy-three (74%) individuals were included for analysis at 24 months; age 65 ± 8 years, BMI 29.3 ± 4.8 kg/m(2), South Asian ethnicity 21%. A statistically significant reduction in 2-h glucose of -1.6 mmol/l (-0.4 to -2.7) was seen in the education-with-pedometer group compared with the control group. There is no significant difference in the education-only group. Conclusion Improvements in glucose regulation following a pragmatic group-based structured education with pedometer use were sustained at 24 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03357.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fourteen articles were not included in the meta-analysis because they provided insufficient data for analyses or because they reported outcomes from a trial already included in the analysis but with data from other follow-up times.

    “Fourteen articles were not included in the meta-analysis because they provided insufficient data for analyses (i.e., did not report SEs for outcomes and authors did not respond to requests for these data) (23–27) or because these articles reported outcomes from a trial already included in the analysis but with data from other follow-up times (28–36).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yates, T., Davies, M. J., Sehmi, S., Gorely, T., & Khunti, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Yates, T.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-19
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1268-1271
ISSN
0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119612662
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Diabetes UK
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
prediabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, glucose regulation, structured education programme, physical activity, pedometers, overweight, obesity, South Asian ethnicity, sustained effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Prediabetic State, Body Mass Index, Walking, Glucose Intolerance, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review