Cited by 33Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Evidence-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: Experiences of health-care providers: Brief intervention in Aboriginal health

CLIFFORD, ANTON, SHAKESHAFT, ANTHONY·2011·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) is a cost-effective treatment for reducing alcohol misuse in non-Indigenous populations. To increase the likelihood of alcohol SBI proving cost-effective for Indigenous Australians in practice, strategies to increase its uptake in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) should be implemented. The aim of this study is to describe the experiences of health-care providers supported to implement evidence-based alcohol SBI in two ACCHSs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Pre- and post-surveys were administered to health staff (n = 32) participating in training workshops, followed by group interviews with health-care providers delivering alcohol SBI. Patient group interviews were also conducted. Survey results were summarised using descriptive statistics and interviews were analysed using a phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Thirty-two per cent (n = 10) of workshop participants were confident or very confident at baseline to deliver alcohol SBI, increasing significantly to 81% (n = 25) post-training (McNemar Test, P < 0.05). Fifty-seven per cent (n = 16) of health-care providers attending workshops reported delivering alcohol SBI in the following 6 months. Group interviews with health-care providers elicited five themes relating to their experiences of alcohol SBI delivery. Patients in group interviews expressed a preference to be screened for alcohol as part of health assessments. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Training workshops appear to be an acceptable initial strategy for disseminating alcohol SBI to ACCHSs. Outreach support is required to assist health-care providers to tailor guidelines and resources, and optimally integrate their clinical skills with evidence-based practice. Patients' needs should inform the tailoring process. Tailored collaborative and supportive strategies are probably required to optimally disseminate alcohol SBI in ACCHSs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00192.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 33

Authors
CLIFFORD, A., & SHAKESHAFT, A.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • CLIFFORD, ANTON
  • SHAKESHAFT, ANTHONY
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
55-62
ISSN
0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1794471516
Cited by
33
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
alcohol screening and brief intervention, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services, Indigenous Australians, health professionals' experiences, evidence-based practice dissemination, alcohol abuse, Indigenous health services
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Attitude to Health, Australia, Community Health Services, Community-Institutional Relations, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Counseling, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Substance Abuse Detection, Focus Groups, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review