Cited by 105EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Personality Types and Language Learning in an EFL Context

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study of the relationships between the personality types of a group of English as a foreign language (EFL) students in Indonesia and various measures of their academic performance in a semester‐long course including a series of EFL language measures. Students were the entering class of English majors (N=76) at a university in Indonesia in the fall of 1991. We tracked them through their performance in an Integrated Course, a 9‐hour‐per‐week intensive basic course they needed to pass in order to move on to any second semester or higher course. The course is team‐taught in 3 sections of students, with 3 teachers teaching each section. We gave the students the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which had been translated into Indonesian. We report and discuss the validity and reliability of using this as a measure of students’ personality types. In addition, we tested the students monthly on reading comprehension, vocabulary, grammar, and writing. Results show that these EFL students are almost evenly divided between Extraverts and Introverts, with over 50% of the students being 1 of 2 (out of 16 possible) types: ESTJ (37%), ISTJ (21%). The distribution of types for these EFL students is similar to those of ESL students in similar studies. Although extraversion and introversion are related to vocabulary and composite course scores, there are few other direct relationships between learners’ personality types and their language performance. We discuss implications for further research, as well as for EFL/ESL classrooms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00641.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of introversion correlate with high scores in second languages' written and vocabulary tests.

    “High levels of introversion correlate with high scores in second languages' written and vocabulary tests (Carrell et al., 1996;Robinson et al., 1994;van Daele et al., 2006).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Carrell et al., 1996

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Anderson N. J., 1992, A preliminary investigation into the relationships between reading comprehension and language learning strategies, personality type and language aptitude
  2. Carrell P. L., 1994, Styles and strategies in second language acquisition
  3. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01958.x · DOI
  4. Carroll J. B., 1990, Language aptitude reconsidered, 11
  5. Ehrman M. E., 1990, Language aptitude reconsidered, 126
  6. Ehrman M. E., 1990, Linguistics, language teaching, and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice, and research, 413
  7. Ehrman M. E., 1995, Language aptitude, personality, and language learning: Is there a link
  8. Ehrman M. E., 1995, Personality, language learning aptitude, and program structure
  9. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05302.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.x · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Galbraith V., 1988, Individual difference correlates of second‐language achievement: An annotated bibliography
  13. Jensen G. H., 1989, Personality and the teaching of composition
  14. Macdaid G. P., 1986, Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator atlas of type tables
  15. 10.1037/14404-000 · DOI
  16. Myers I. B., 1987, Introduction to type
  17. Myers I. B., 1985, Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator
  18. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01063.x · DOI
  19. Ohsawa T., 1975, MBTI experiences in Japan: Career choice, selection, placement, and counseling for individual development
  20. Ohsawa T., 1981, A profile of top executives of Japanese companies
  21. 10.18806/tesl.v9i2.602 · DOI
  22. Oxford R. L., 1993, Instructional implications of gender differences in second/foreign language (L2) learning styles and strategies, Applied Language Learning, 4, 65
  23. 10.1017/S0267190500002464 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Oxford R. L., 1991, Challenges in the 1990s for college foreign language programs, 1
  25. Oxford R. L., 1992, Teacher‐student style‐wars in the language classroom: Research insights and suggestions, Bulletin of the Association of Departments of Foreign Languages, 23, 38
  26. Scarcella R. C., 1992, The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom
  27. Skehan P., 1989, Individual differences in second language learning
  28. Snow R. E., 1989, Learning and individual differences, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carrell, P. L., Prince, M. S., & Astika, G. G.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Satya Wacana Christian University (ID)
Corresponding author
Carrell, Patricia L.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
75-99
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W1980094178
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
24.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
personality types, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, EFL learners, academic performance, extraversion-introversion, Indonesian EFL learners, vocabulary, reading comprehension, grammar, writing, instrument validity and reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review