The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gleaner, fisher, trader, processor: understanding gendered employment in fisheries and aquaculture
Abstract
Most research on gender difference or inequities in capture fisheries and aquaculture in Africa and the Asia‐Pacific focuses on the gender division of labour. Emerging research on globalization, market changes, poverty and trends in gendered employment within this sector reveals the need to move beyond this narrow perspective. If gleaning and post‐harvesting activities were enumerated, the fisheries and aquaculture sector might well turn out to be female sphere. A livelihoods approach better enables an understanding of how employment in this sector is embedded in other social, cultural, economic, political and ecological structures and processes that shape gender inequities and how these might be reduced. We focus on four thematic areas – markets and migration, capabilities and well‐being, networks and identities, governance and rights – as analytical entry points. These also provide a framework to identify research gaps and generate a comparative understanding of the impact of development processes and socioecological changes, including issues of climate change, adaptation and resilience, on gendered employment. Without an adequate analysis of gender, fisheries management and development policies may have negative effects on people’s livelihoods, well‐being and the environment they depend on, or fail altogether to achieve intended outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clapp, J., & Sen, A. (1999) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,411
Sen, A. (1993) · The Quality of Life · doi:10.1093/0198287976.003.0003 · Cited by 3,128
Sen, A. (2007) · The Philosophy of Economics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819025.019 · Cited by 1,862
The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries
Allison, E. H., & Ellis, F. (2001) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-597x(01)00023-9 · Cited by 1,317
Staying Secure, Staying Poor: The “Faustian Bargain”
Wood, G. (2003) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(02)00213-9 · Cited by 551
Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook
Bank, W., Food and Agriculture Organization, & Development, I. F. F. A. (2008) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7587-7 · Cited by 451
Allison, E. H., & Horemans, B. (2006) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.001 · Cited by 373
Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia
Pomeroy, R. S., Katon, B. M., & Harkes, I. (2001) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-597x(01)00010-0 · Cited by 363
Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development
Goetz, A. M. (1997) · Cited by 308
Women and Fish-for-Sex: Transactional Sex, HIV/AIDS and Gender in African Fisheries
Béné, C., & Merten, S. (2008) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.010 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Béné, C., Arthur, R., Norbury, H., Allison, E. H., Beveridge, M., Bush, S., Campling, L., Leschen, W., Little, D., Squires, D., et al. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.007 · Cited by 871
Smith, H., & Basurto, X. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00236 · Cited by 283
Public health perspectives on aquaculture
Gormaz, J. G., Fry, J. P., Erazo, M., & Love, D. C. (2014) · Current Environmental Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s40572-014-0018-8 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Weeratunge, N., Snyder, K. A., & Sze, C. P.
- Venue
- Fish and Fisheries
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-29
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-420
- ISSN
- 1467-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-2979
- OpenAlex
- W1528623227
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gleaner, fisher, trader, processor: understanding gendered employment in fisheries and aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x
- The paper
- Weeratunge, N., Snyder, K. A., & Sze, C. P. (2010). Gleaner, fisher, trader, processor: understanding gendered employment in fisheries and aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.