The impact of cumulative pressure on accounting students’ propensity to commit plagiarism: an experimental approach
Abstract
Adopting aspects of Jones, T.M., 1991, Academy of Management Review16, 366–395 issue‐contingent model of ethical decision‐making to guide our choice of variables, we investigate perceptions of factors that affect student plagiarism. In an experimental setting, time pressure and assessment weighting are manipulated between‐subjects, whilst the severity of plagiarism is examined within‐subjects. Our findings confirm that time pressure and assessment weighting are positively related to perceptions of the likelihood of plagiarism and that plagiarism is perceived as more likely for less severe acts. Further, the likelihood of plagiarism increases as the cumulative pressure of both time deadline and assessment weighting increases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Time pressure to complete academic tasks encourages plagiarism among students.
“Preliminary research indicates that time pressure to complete academic tasks encourages plagiarism among students (Koh et al., 2011).”
From Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024) · cites this paper as Koh et al., 2011
Cites
Adaptive strategy selection in decision making.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534 · Cited by 1,955 · see citing works
In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize
Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360701310805 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Premeaux, S. R. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-2585-y · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
“Preliminary research indicates that time pressure to complete academic tasks encourages plagiarism among students (Koh et al., 2011).”
Background
- Authors
- Koh, H. P., Scully, G., & Woodliff, D. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- ORCID
- Woodliff, David R.
- Venue
- Accounting & Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-19
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 985-1005
- ISSN
- 0810-5391 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-629X
- OpenAlex
- W2083820822
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Accounting and Finance (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Education and Careers
- Keywords
- plagiarism, accounting students, academic integrity, time pressure, assessment weighting, ethical decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review