Cited by 40Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationAccounting Education and Careers

The impact of cumulative pressure on accounting students’ propensity to commit plagiarism: an experimental approach

Koh, Hwee Ping, Scully, Glennda, Woodliff, David R.·2011·Accounting & Finance

Abstract

Adopting aspects of Jones, T.M., 1991, Academy of Management Review16, 366–395 issue‐contingent model of ethical decision‐making to guide our choice of variables, we investigate perceptions of factors that affect student plagiarism. In an experimental setting, time pressure and assessment weighting are manipulated between‐subjects, whilst the severity of plagiarism is examined within‐subjects. Our findings confirm that time pressure and assessment weighting are positively related to perceptions of the likelihood of plagiarism and that plagiarism is perceived as more likely for less severe acts. Further, the likelihood of plagiarism increases as the cumulative pressure of both time deadline and assessment weighting increases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2010.00381.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koh, H. P., Scully, G., & Woodliff, D. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
Accounting & Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-19
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
985-1005
ISSN
  • 0810-5391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-629X
OpenAlex
W2083820822
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounting and Finance (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Education and Careers
Keywords
plagiarism, accounting students, academic integrity, time pressure, assessment weighting, ethical decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review