The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ALTERNATIVE ESTIMATING AND TESTING EMPIRICAL STRATEGIES FOR FRACTIONAL REGRESSION MODELS
Open accessAbstract
In many economic settings, the variable of interest is often a fraction or a proportion, being defined only on the unit interval. The bounded nature of such variables and, in some cases, the possibility of nontrivial probability mass accumulating at one or both boundaries raise some interesting estimation and inference issues. In this paper we (i) provide a comprehensive survey of the main alternative models and estimation methods suitable to deal with fractional response variables, (ii) propose a full testing methodology to assess the validity of the assumptions required by each alternative estimator and (iii) examine the finite-sample properties of most of the estimators and tests discussed through an extensive Monte Carlo study. An application concerning corporate capital structure choices is also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data
RAJAN, R. G., & ZINGALES, L. (1995) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x · Cited by 6,538
A better lemon squeezer? maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables.
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.1.54 · Cited by 1,788
Cited by
Sánchez-Amboage, E., Castellanos-García, P., & Crespo-Pereira, V. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103735 · Cited by 21
Investigating coordinated account creation using burst detection and network analysis
Bellutta, D., & Carley, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-023-00695-7 · Cited by 15
Analysis of External Financing Use: A Study of Small and Medium Enterprises in Malawi
Mulaga, A. N. (2013) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v8n7p55 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J. S., & Murteira, J. M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Surveys
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-68
- ISSN
- 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109495844
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.