The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY ESTIMATION: A PRACTICAL REVIEW
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to provide empirical researchers with an overview of the methodological issues that arise when estimating total factor productivity at the establishment level, as well as of the existing (parametric and semi‐parametric) techniques designed to overcome them. Apart from the well‐known simultaneity and selection bias, attention is given to methodological issues that have emerged more recently and that are related to the use of deflated values of inputs and outputs (as opposed to quantities) in estimating productivity at the firm level, as well as to the endogeneity of product choice. In discussing the estimation procedures applied in the literature, attention is given to recent developments in the field. Using data on single‐product firms active in the Belgian food and beverages sector, the most commonly applied estimators are illustrated, allowing for comparison of the obtained productivity estimates by way of a simple evaluation exercise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
Javorcik, B. S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041464605 · Cited by 2,950
Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.70 · Cited by 904
Cited by
Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1611 · Cited by 2,252
Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth
Ortiz-Bobea, A., Ault, T. R., Carrillo, C. M., Chambers, R. G., & Lobell, D. B. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1 · Cited by 1,047
Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching
Bernard, A. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.70 · Cited by 904
Market Selection, Reallocation, and Restructuring in the U.S. Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Krizan, C. J. (2006) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.748 · Cited by 552
Institutional fragility and outward foreign direct investment from China
Shi, W., Sun, S. L., Yan, D., & Zhu, Z. (2017) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-016-0050-z · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Beveren, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Surveys
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-128
- ISSN
- 0950-0804 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6419
- OpenAlex
- W3121372586
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 42.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY ESTIMATION: A PRACTICAL REVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x
- The paper
- Van Beveren, I. (2012). TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY ESTIMATION: A PRACTICAL REVIEW. Journal of Economic Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.