The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory
Open accessAbstract
abstract This paper identifies four sets of textual practices that researchers in the field of organization and management theory (OMT) have used in their attempts to be reflexive. We characterize them as multi‐perspective, multi‐voicing, positioning and destabilizing. We show how each set of practices can help to produce reflexive research, but also how each embodies limitations and paradoxes. Finally, we consider the interplay among these sets of practices to develop ideas for new avenues for reflexive practice by OMT researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers
Lakatos, I. (1978) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621123 · Cited by 3,045
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
The archeology of accounting systems
Hopwood, A. G. (1987) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9 · Cited by 1,265
On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner
Cunliffe, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1177/1052562904264440 · Cited by 737 · cited 1×
“In the case of the former, reflexive practices are those embodied practices in which the researcher engages in relation to research subjects, practitioners and students (e.g. Boje and Rosile, 1994; Cunliffe, 2002a, 2002b, 2004).”
Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675
Cited by
HRM 4.0 and New Managerial Competences Profile: The COMAU Case
Fregnan, E., Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578251 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-501
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1981329468
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 83.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
- The paper
- Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on Reflexivity: Reflexive Textual Practices in Organization and Management Theory. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
