The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture, personality, and reactions to praise and criticism1
Abstract
An empirical study was designed to investigate the effects of personality and sociocultural background on reactions to positive and negative performance feedback. Eighty college students of two sociocultural backgrounds (Mexican- and Anglo-American) were asked to work on a three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle and were then either praised or criticized, ostensibly according to their “problem-solving strategies,” but actually on the basis of random assignment to either condition. Seven dependent variables were included, representing various reactions to the feedback. Four-way analyses of variance were conducted on each dependent measure with the independent variables being type of feedback, locus of control, sex of subject, and ethnicity. In addition to consistent main effects for feedback, the results revealed that reactions to feedback, particularly criticism, are often mediated by personality and/or sociocultural factors. The findings are discussed in relation to previous literature and the need to take a sociocultural perspective in psychological research is emphasized.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the present phenomenon seems important to the achievement of all children and not just one specific cultural group.”
From Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. (1998) · cites this paper as Garza & Lipton, 1978
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1016/0022-1031(67)90001-7 · DOI
- Adler L. L., 1974, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 683, 10.2466/pms.1974.39.2.683 · DOI
- Aronson E., 1968, The handbook of social psychology
- Baron R. M., 1974, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 285, 10.1037/h0036662 · DOI
- Baron R. M., 1972, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 124, 10.1037/h0032099 · DOI
- Brislin R. W., 1973, Cross-cultural research methods
- Carringer D., 1974, Journal of Negro Education, 43, 212, 10.2307/2966823 · DOI
- Clayman S. J., 1977, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 236, 10.1177/014616727700300216 · DOI
- 10.1037//0003-066X.32.11.934 · DOI
- Dutton D. G., 1972, Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 24, 366, 10.1037/h0033720 · DOI
- Fodor E. M., 1974, Journal of Psychology, 88, 253, 10.1080/00223980.1974.9915736 · DOI
- Garza R. T., 1977, Chicano Psychology
- Garza R. T., 1978, Psychology in the Schools, 15, 111, 10.1002/1520-6807(197801)15:1<111::AID-PITS2310150121>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Garza R. T., 1974, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 919, 10.1037/h0037544 · DOI
- Garza R. T., 1973, Journal of College Student Personnel, 14, 399
- Garza R. T., 1977, Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 635, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4106_10 · DOI
- Gergen K. J., 1971, The concept of self
- Giesen M., 1974, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 449, 10.1037/h0037032 · DOI
- Gilchrist E. P., 1916, School and Society, 4, 872
- Guerra M. H., 1970, Educating the Mexican-American
- Harvey O. J., 1962, Sociometry, 25, 336, 10.2307/2785773 · DOI
- Harvey O. J., 1957, Journal of personality, 25, 393, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1957.tb01536.x · DOI
- Heider F., 1958, The psychology of interpersonal relations, 10.1037/10628-000 · DOI · Paper page
- Irwin L., 1969, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 221, 10.1037/h0027192 · DOI
- Joe V. C., 1971, Psychological Reports, 28, 619, 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.2.619 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289233 · DOI
- Kagan S., 1974, Child Development, 45, 765, 10.2307/1127843 · DOI
- Kagan S., 1975, Developmental Psychology, 11, 71, 10.1037/h0076127 · DOI
- Kennedy W. A., 1962, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 143, 10.2466/pms.1962.15.1.143 · DOI
- Kennedy W. A., 1964, Psychological Bulletin, 62, 323, 10.1037/h0042917 · DOI
- Kirk R. E., 1968, Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences
- Levine R. A., 1973, Culture, behavior, and personality
- Lintner A. C., 1974, American Education Research Journal, 11, 231, 10.3102/00028312011003231 · DOI
- Lipton J. P., 1977, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8, 259, 10.1177/002202217783001 · DOI
- Lipton J. P., 1978, Journal of College Student Personnel, 19, 268
- Losen S. M., 1961, Journal of Personality, 29, 258, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1961.tb01660.x · DOI
- Magnusson D., 1976, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 17, 253, 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1976.tb00239.x · DOI
- Magnusson D., 1977, Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology
- 10.1037//0003-066X.32.12.1069 · DOI
- Mead M., 1928, Coming of age in Samoa
- Parsons O. A., 1970, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 30, 10.1037/h0029594 · DOI
- Phares E. J., 1976, Locus of control in personality
- Price-Williams D. R., 1975, Explorations in cross-cultural psychology
- Prociuk T. J., 1975, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 549, 10.1037/h0076506 · DOI
- Ramirez M., 1974, Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education
- Ramirez M., 1974, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 212, 10.1177/002202217400500206 · DOI
- Reitz H. J., 1972, Proceedings of the Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 263
- Regan J. W., 1973, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 295, 10.1037/h0076300 · DOI
- Rotter J. B., 1966, Psychological Monographs, 80, 10.1037/h0092976 · DOI · Paper page
- Rotter J. B., 1975, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 56, 10.1037/h0076301 · DOI
- Samuda R. J., 1975, Psychological testing of American minorities
- Sigall H., 1976, Journal of Personality, 44, 613, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00141.x · DOI
- Skolnik P., 1971, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 62, 10.1037/h0030709 · DOI
- Thibaut J., 1959, The social psychology of groups
- Tin-Yee Hsieh T., 1969, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 122, 10.1037/h0027341 · DOI
- Triandis H. C., 1972, The analysis of subjective culture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33 · Cited by 1,709
How are Responses to Verbal Insult Related to Cultural Collectivism and Power Distance?
Bond, M. H., Wan, K.-C., Leung, K., & Giacalone, R. A. (1985) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022002185016001009 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Garza, R. T., & Lipton, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 743-761
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1974424024
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- praise, criticism, performance feedback, locus of control, personality, sociocultural background, ethnicity, Mexican American students, Anglo-American students, sex differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review