The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Next Generation of Moderator Research in Personality Psychology
Abstract
ABSTRACT The concept of a moderator variable has a long and checkered history in personality psychology. In this article I review the methodological and conceptual advances in recent moderator variable research. I then report the results of a number of empirical analyses of three newly proposed idiographic moderator variables: scalability, metatraits, and construct similarity, as well as the ipsatized variance index. The results of these analyses indicate that moderator effect sizes in personality can be expected to correspond to a correlation of about. 10:1 then consider two recent prescriptions, (a) aggregating trait‐specific moderators into general ones, and (b) evaluating joint (e.g., triple interaction) moderator effects. Following these prescriptions did not increase the size of the moderator effects in these data. I conclude that moderator effects in personality will be small, and will thus be most reliably detected in very large samples with predictors that are strongly related to the criteria. Even small moderator effects can be important and interesting in the context of theory disconfirmation. However, moderator variables generally will not serve to transform weak relations among personality variables into strong ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.
Epstein, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097 · Cited by 1,468
REM sleep facilitation of adaptive waking behavior: A review of the literature.
McGrath, M. J., & Cohen, D. B. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.24 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037
Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376 · Cited by 3,270
Job Resources Buffer the Impact of Job Demands on Burnout.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170 · Cited by 2,483
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., & Kupfer, D. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848 · Cited by 1,712
Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services
Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2000) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00024-5 · Cited by 1,571
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaplin, W. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-178
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2113041397
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Next Generation of Moderator Research in Personality Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00772.x
- The paper
- Chaplin, W. F. (1991). The Next Generation of Moderator Research in Personality Psychology. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00772.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.