The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empathic Accuracy
Abstract
ABSTRACT People are motivated to understand each other's psychological states as well as each other's personality traits. As a consequence, the more traditional study of accuracy in trait inference can be complemented by, and potentially benefit from, the insights provided by the more recent study of empathic accuracy. Findings in this area suggest that future research should devote more attention to (a) the history of the perceiver‐target relationship; (b) the perceiver's desired future relationship with the target; (c) the possibility that perceivers have little or no “metaknowledge” regarding their own empathic ability; and (d) the possibility that, under certain conditions, perceivers might be motivated to be inaccurate, rather than accurate, in their inferences about other people's dispositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700
Forming impressions of personality.
Asch, S. E. (1946) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055756 · Cited by 2,508
Development of an empathy scale.
Hogan, R. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027580 · Cited by 1,493
Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity."
Cronbach, L. J. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0044919 · Cited by 1,368
Empathic: An Unappreciated Way of Being
Rogers, C. R. (1975) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/001100007500500202 · Cited by 1,249
Psychotherapy and Personality Change
Dupont, G. M., Rogers, C. R., & Dymond, R. (1955) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708791 · Cited by 859
Toward Effective Counseling and Psychotherapy: Training and Practice
Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. R. (2007) · Cited by 844
Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Cited by 767
Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues.
Hall, J. A. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845 · Cited by 766
Cited by
The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): a preliminary validation
Crombez, G., Bijttebier, P., Eccleston, C., Mascagni, T., Mertens, G., Goubert, L., & Verstraeten, K. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00121-0 · Cited by 652
Knock, Knock . Who's There? The Imagined Audience
Litt, E. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195 · Cited by 629
Trust in AI: progress, challenges, and future directions
Afroogh, S., Akbari, A., Malone, E., Kargar, M., & Alambeigi, H. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04044-8 · Cited by 507
Gender Differences, Motivation, and Empathic Accuracy: When it Pays to Understand
Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167201276007 · Cited by 440
Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere
Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Ickes, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 587-610
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W4254308238
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empathic Accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x
- The paper
- Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic Accuracy. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.