The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality and Mate Preferences: Five Factors In Mate Selection and Marital Satisfaction
Abstract
ABSTRACT Although personality characteristics figure prominently in what people want in a mate, little is known about precisely which personality characteristics are most important, whether men and women differ in their personality preferences, whether individual women or men differ in what they want, and whether individuals actually get what they want. To explore these issues, two parallel studies were conducted, one using a sample of dating couples (N= 118) and one using a sample of married couples (N= 216). The five‐factor model, operationalized in adjectival form, was used to assess personality characteristics via three data sources—self‐report, partner report, and independent interviewer reports. Participants evaluated on a parallel 40‐item instrument their preferences for the ideal personality characteristics of their mates. Results were consistent across both studies. Women expressed a greater preference than men for a wide array of socially desirable personality traits. Individuals differed in which characteristics they desired, preferring mates who were similar to themselves and actually obtaining mates who embodied what they desired. Finally, the personality characteristics of one's partner significantly predicted marital and sexual dissatisfaction, most notably when the partner was lower on Agreeableness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect‐Openness than desired.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
Self-citation
Cited by
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 · Cited by 1,010
Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407508096700 · Cited by 855
The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.698 · Cited by 816
Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept
Kuppens, S., & Ceulemans, E. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-136
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2064564324
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personality and Mate Preferences: Five Factors In Mate Selection and Marital Satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x
- The paper
- Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and Mate Preferences: Five Factors In Mate Selection and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.