The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants
Abstract
Do young infants treat speech as a special signal, compared with structurally similar non‐speech sounds? We presented 2‐ to 7‐month‐old infants with nonsense speech sounds and complex non‐speech analogues. The non‐speech analogues retain many of the spectral and temporal properties of the speech signal, including the pitch contour information which is known to be salient to young listeners, and thus provide a stringent test for a potential listening bias for speech. Our results show that infants as young as 2 months of age listened longer to speech sounds. This listening selectivity indicates that early‐functioning biases direct infants’ attention to speech, granting speech a special status in relation to other sounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Self-citationFunctional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dehaene, S., & Hertz-Pannier, L. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077066 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 3×
“Though the perception of speech compared with non-speech has been shown to engage specific neural substrates in the left hemisphere of adults (Binder & Price, 2001; Scott, Blank, Rosen & Wise, 2000; Vouloumanos, Kiehl, Werker & Liddle, 2001) and infants ( Dehaene-Lambertz, Dehaene & Hertz-Pannier, 2002; Pena, Maki, Ko…”
BackgroundMethodInfants' Preference for the Predominant Stress Patterns of English Words
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131210 · Cited by 981
Preference for infant‐directed speech in the first month after birth
Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130766 · Cited by 859
Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech
Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90017-8 · Cited by 818
Cited by
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Coffey-Corina, S., Padden, D., Rivera-Gaxiola, M., & Nelson, T. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2154 · Cited by 886
Britto, D. B. D. O. E. (2007) · Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia · doi:10.1590/s1516-80342007000400016 · Cited by 802
Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain?
Kuhl, P. K. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00572.x · Cited by 725
The faculty of language: what's special about it?
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-17
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 270-276
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2110170855
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00345.x
- The paper
- Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00345.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
