The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation
Abstract
This analysis utilizes farm‐level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled (“green‐box”) payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county‐level acreage model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Cited by
Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries
Bank, W. (2004) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/0-8213-5863-4 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, B. K., & Mishra, A. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-89
- ISSN
- 0002-9092 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8276
- OpenAlex
- W2054514767
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 99.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00839.x
- The paper
- Goodwin, B. K., & Mishra, A. K. (2006). Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00839.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
