The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Highest Form Of The Geographer's Art∗
Abstract
Geography is an integrative discipline to which society has assigned responsibility for the study of areas. It is expected to satisfy human curiosity about how much of what is where, and why it is there, in an organized manner that will facilitate comprehension and retention. Geography must be both an art and a science, because understanding the meaning of area cannot be reduced to a formal process. The discipline deals with an enormous range of phenomena and must provide a congenial home for many different kinds of practitioners. Geography has survived repeated misguided attempts to “make it into a Science” by amputating vital parts of the discipline. Systematic geography generates theories to facilitate an understanding of regions, and regional geography is the proving ground where theories are rested empirically. The idea of the region provides the essential unifying theme that integrates the diverse subdisciplines of geography. The highest form of the geographer's art is the production of evocative descriptions that facilitate an understanding and an appreciation of regions. Regions are subjective artistic devices. Regional geography must be informed by a sense of time, and it cannot ignore the physical environment. It begins with the visible features of the earth's surface, but quickly transcends them and attempts to understand the values that motivate the human behavior that is related to them. Exploration, or fieldwork, is a basic research technique in geography, and the most geographic hypotheses are generated by field observation and by cartographic analysis. Effective communication is a difficult and demanding art that regional geographers must master. The frontiers of regional geography lie in our great cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework
Omernik, J. M., & Griffith, G. E. (2014) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0364-1 · Cited by 1,003
Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials
Hughes, R. M., Larsen, D. P., & Omernik, J. M. (1986) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf01866767 · Cited by 356
Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’
Wright, D. J., Goodchild, M. F., & Proctor, J. D. (1997) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.872057 · Cited by 260
The industrial revolution and the regional geography of England
Langton, J. (1984) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622166 · Cited by 213
Wyly, E. (2009) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1080/00330120902931952 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, J. F.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W2084927616
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 132.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Highest Form Of The Geographer's Art∗. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01380.x
- The paper
- Hart, J. F. (1982). The Highest Form Of The Geographer's Art∗. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1982.tb01380.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.