Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latin American Indigenous Geographies of Fear: Living in the Shadow of Racism, Lack of Development, and Antiterror Measures

Radcliffe, Sarah A.·2007·Annals of the Association of American Geographers
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00544.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

U.S.-dominated geographies of fear after 11 September 2001 represent indigenous peoples as potential security threats and destabilizing influences on Latin American nation-states. This article contextualizes these narratives by outlining the geographies of fear to which Latin American indigenous populations have been subjected in nation-building, resulting in restricted development opportunities and insecure livelihoods. As recent neoliberal development restructures indigenous rights, indigenous geographies of hope remain only unevenly realized. Yet, as a proclaimed alternative to development, postdevelopment approaches only partially capture the nature of indigenous geographies of hope. By critically evaluating neoliberal and postdevelopment approaches, the article ends by outlining the specific perspective geography brings to development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00544.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Adelman J., 2002, New Left Review, 18, 41
  2. Andolina R., Multiethnic transnationalism: Indigenous development in the Andes
  3. Ari Chachaki W., 2005, Aruskipasipxanasataki
  4. Collins J., 2001, NACLA Report on the Americas, 23, 40
  5. Comision CVR., 2003, Informe final
  6. Escobar A., 1995, Power of development, 211
  7. 10.1525/can.1994.9.2.02a00040 · DOI
  8. Karakras A., 2002, Beyond the lost decade, 20
  9. Macdonald T., 2003, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 26
  10. Massey D., 2005, For space
  11. 2002, Evaluation of the situation in the north of Ecuador: 2002
  12. Parker M., 2002, Utopia and organisation
  13. Radcliffe S. A., 2006, Society and Space, 24, 231
  14. Radcliffe S. A., 2006, Culture and development in a globalizing world, 83, 10.4324/9780203641019 · DOI
  15. 2004, Democracy in Latin America: Towards a citizen's democracy
  16. Walcott J., 2003, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 26
  17. Walcott J., 2005, Exploring the discourse of border development: Transnationalism and the Ecuadorian state

Cited by

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Radcliffe, S. A.
Venue
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-06
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
385-397
ISSN
  • 0004-5608
  • 1467-8306
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00544.x
Cited by
46
References
62
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.