Cited by 571Efficiency Analysis Using DEAAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Economics and Practices

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE THE TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY OF INDIAN FARMERS

Open access
Coelli, Tim J., Battese, George E.·1996·Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

The agricultural production of Indian farmers is investigated using a stochastic frontier production function which incorporates a model for the technical inefficiency effects. Farm‐level data from the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi‐Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) are used. Variables considered in the model for the inefficiency effects include the age and level of education of the farmers, farm size and the year of observation. The parameters of the stochastic frontier production function are estimated simultaneously with those involved in the model for the inefficiency effects. This approach differs from the usual practice of predicting farm‐level inefficiency effects and then regressing these upon various factors in a second‐stage of modelling. The results indicate that the above factors do have a significant influence upon the inefficiency effects of farmers in two of the three villages considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00558.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Aigner, D., C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt (1977), 'Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier ProductionFunction Models', Journal ofEconometrics, 6,21-37.
  2. Bardhan, P.K. (1973), 'Size, Productivity and Returns to Scale: An Application of Farm-level Data in Indian Agriculture', Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1370- 1386.
  3. Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1992), 'Frontier Production Functions, Technical Effi- ciency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India', Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.
  4. Battese, G.E., T.J. Coelli and T.C. Colby (1989), 'Estimation of Frontier Production Functions and the Efficiencies of Indian Farms Using Panel Data From ICRISAT's Village Level Studies', Journal of Quantitative Economics, 5,327-348.
  5. Bauer, P.W. (1990), 'Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers', Journal of Econometrics, 46,39-56.
  6. Coelli, T.J. (1992), 'A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation: FRONTIER, Version 2.0', Economics Letters, 39,29-32.
  7. Coelli, T.J. (1995a), 'Recent Developments in Frontier Estimation and Efficiency Measurement', Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39,219-245.
  8. Coelli, T.J. (1995b), 'A Monte Car10 Analysis of the Stochastic Frontier Production Function', Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6,247-268.
  9. Farrell, M.J. (1957), 'The Measurement of Productive Efficiency', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120,253-290.
  10. Greene, W.H. (1993), 'The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis', in Fried, H.O., C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt (eds), The Measurement of Productive Eficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, pp.
  11. Huang. C.J. and J-T. Liu (1994), 'Estimation of a Non-neutral Stochastic Frontier Production Function', Journal ofPmductiviry Analysis, 4, 171-180.
  12. Jondrow, J., C.A.K. Lovell, I.S. Materov and P. Schmidt (1982), 'On Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model', Jour- nal of Econometrics, 19, 233-238. 185-208. 325-332. 68-1 19. 14678489a, 1996, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00558.x, Wiley Online Library on [20/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
  13. Kalirajan, K.P. (19811, 'An Econometric Analysis of Yield Variability in Paddy Produc- tion', Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29,283-294.
  14. Kumbhakar, S.C., S . Ghosh and J.T. McGuckin (1991), 'A Generalised Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms', Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9,279-286.
  15. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck (1 977), 'Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions With Composed Error', lnternational Economic Review, 18, 435-444.
  16. Parikh, A. and K. Shah (1994), 'Measurement of Technical Efficiency in the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45, 132-138.
  17. Reifschneider, D. and R. Stevenson (1991), 'Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency', International Economic Review,
  18. Semi-arid Tropics, The John Wopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  19. 14678489a, 1996, 2, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00558.x, Wiley Online Library on [20/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coelli, T. J., & Battese, G. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of New England (US)
Venue
Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-08
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
103-128
ISSN
0004-9395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050471002
Cited by
571
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 29
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
Keywords
technical inefficiency, Indian farmers, stochastic frontier analysis, farmer age, farmer education, farm size, semi-arid agriculture, ICRISAT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review