Cited by 230Online and Blended LearningLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds

Wang, Minjuan·2007·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

This study examines the effect of an important cultural dimension—power distance index (PDI)—on learners’ perceptions of their online learning experiences. PDI refers to the degree to which a learner’s response to another individual in a learning setting is inhibited or otherwise negatively altered when the other individual holds a position that is superior or inferior to the learner’s own position. This study aims to generate guidelines for better design and facilitation of online courses that can effectively engage all students in the learning process. Research findings are particularly relevant to researchers and practitioners who are interested in the cultural aspects of online learning. This study contributes to the current knowledge base about designing effective online courses and about practicing culturally responsive teaching in an online setting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00626.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

10 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1177/1350507600314006 · DOI
  2. Fraenkel J. R., 2002, How to design and evaluate research in education
  3. He K. K., 2005, The education innovating in information age, Basic Education Reference, 5, 1
  4. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
  5. 10.1016/0092-6566(88)90022-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF03026151 · DOI
  7. Picciano A. G.(2002).Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction Presence and Performance in an Online Course.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network 6 1. Retrieved March 15 2006 fromhttp://www.sloan‐c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_picciano.asp
  8. 10.1007/BF02504946 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/03057640410001700589 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Simon G., 2002, E‐tivities: The key to active online learning
  11. Triandis H., 1995, Individualism and Collectivism
  12. 10.1080/0952398032000092116 · DOI
  13. Wang M. J., 2004, Correlational analysis of student visibility and learning outcomes in an online setting, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 71
  14. 10.1007/1-4020-3669-8_11 · DOI
  15. Yu S. Q., 2002, The object and strategy of integrating information technology into curriculum, People’s Education, 2, 53
  16. 10.1007/BF02504688 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Minjuan
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-05
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
294-311
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2006485554
Cited by
230
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
33.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
online course design, cultural diversity, student engagement, culturally responsive teaching, online learning, learner perceptions, course facilitation, intercultural learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review