The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success
Abstract
Herein, we present data from two studies of Twitter usage in different postsecondary courses with the goal of analyzing the relationships surrounding student engagement and collaboration as they intersect learning outcomes. Study 1 was conducted with 125 students taking a first‐year seminar course, half of who were required to use Twitter while the other half used Ning. Study 2 was conducted with 135 students taking a large lecture general education course where Twitter participation was voluntary. Faculty in Study 1 engaged with students on Twitter in activities based on an a priori theoretical model, while faculty in Study 2 only engaged students sporadically on the platform. Qualitative analyses of tweets and quantitative outcomes show that faculty participation on the platform, integration of Twitter into the course based on a theoretically driven pedagogical model and requiring students to use Twitter are essential components of improved outcomes. Practitioner notes: What is already known about this topic Student use of social media is integrally related to how students engage the world. Little research exists on how social media use is linked to college student engagement in relation to academic outcomes. One study using a controlled design demonstrated a relationship between Twitter use and student engagement. What this paper adds An empirical comparison of two ways in which Twitter was differently integrated into college courses. The utilization of quantitative and qualitative data to assess real‐world academic outcomes related to Twitter use. Evidence‐based best practices for using Twitter in educationally relevant and productive ways. Implications for practice and/or policy If integrating Twitter in their courses, faculty should require and structure its use along educationally relevant criteria. To achieve the most effective results, faculty should have a theoretically driven pedagogical basis for incorporating Twitter. Faculty should actively engage with students on the platform to obtain maximum benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Facebook and academic performance
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 · Cited by 1,578 · cited 1×
“…studies have examined the relationship between Facebook use and student learning; however, the results have been mixed with two studies showing no relationship and two showing a negative relationship (Junco, 2012b; Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010; Kolek & Saunders, 2008; Pasek, More & Hargittai, 2009).”
ResultThe effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades: Twitter and student engagement
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x · Cited by 1,535
Self-citationEgocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think?
Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z.-W. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.925 · Cited by 425
Facebook and academic performance: Reconciling a media sensation with data
Pasek, J., More, E., & Hargittai, E. (2009) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v14i5.2498 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis
de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Pinto, D. C., Herter, M. M., Sampaio, C. H., & Babin, B. J. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00731-5 · Cited by 523
Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 · Cited by 475
Bond, M., Zawacki‐Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12730 · Cited by 243
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010 · Cited by 225
Webb, L., Clough, J., O’Reilly, D., Wilmott, D., & Witham, G. (2017) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.007 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-287
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2157769000
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 76.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
- The paper
- Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.