The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management
Abstract
The relevance problem of academic management research in organization and management is an old and thorny one. Recent discussions on this issue have resulted in proposals to use more Mode 2 knowledge production in our field. These discussions focused mainly on the process of research itself and less on the products produced by this process. Here the focus is on the so‐called field‐tested and grounded technological rule as a possible product of Mode 2 research with the potential to improve the relevance of academic research in management. Technological rules can be seen as solution‐oriented knowledge. Such knowledge may be called Management Theory, while more description‐oriented knowledge may be called Organization Theory. In this article the nature of technological rules in management is discussed, as well as their development, their use in actual management practice and the potential for cross‐fertilization between Management Theory and Organization Theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Cited by
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact
Barnett, M. L., Henriques, I., & Husted, B. W. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319900539 · Cited by 358
The classification of construction waste material using a deep convolutional neural network
Davis, P., Aziz, F., Newaz, M. T., Sher, W., & Simon, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103481 · Cited by 204
Costa, E., Soares, A. L., & de Sousa, J. P. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102070 · Cited by 100
Duru, M. (2013) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.002 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Aken, J. E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-36
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W3125427202
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
- The paper
- Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.