Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment
Abstract
Effective corporate social responsibility policies are a requirement for today's companies. Policies have not only to be formulated, they also have to be delivered by corporate employees. This paper uses existing research findings to identify two types of factors that may impact on employee motivation and commitment to CSR ‘buy‐in’. The first of these is contextual: employee attitudes and behaviours will be affected by organizational culture and climate, by whether CSR policies are couched in terms of compliance or in terms of values, and by whether such policies are integrated into business processes or simply an ‘add‐on’ that serves as window‐dressing. The second set of factors is perceptual. Motivation and commitment will be affected by the extent to which they can align personal identity and image with that of the organization, by their perceptions of justice and fairness both in general and in terms of how CSR performance is rewarded, and by their impressions concerning the attitude of top management to CSR issues and performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between CSR and employee attitude is culture driven.
“Nevertheless, literature advocates that the relationship between CSR and employee attitude is culture driven (Zappala, 2004; Collier and Esteban, 2007).”
From Corporate social responsibility influences employee engagement (2018) · cites this paper as Collier and Esteban, 2007
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049 · see citing works
Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726703056001448 · Cited by 1,372 · see citing works
Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors
Butterfield, K. D., Trevin, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700537004 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elbeltagi, I., & Agag, G. (2016) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-10-2014-0244 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions
Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility
Heikkurinen, P. (2010) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.225 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Managing sustainability reporting: Many ways to publish exemplary reports
Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., & Hassink, H. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.098 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Corporate social responsibility influences employee engagement
Tsourvakas, G., & Yfantidou, I. (2018) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-09-2016-0153 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collier, J., & Esteban, R.
- Venue
- Business Ethics: A European Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-33
- ISSN
- 0962-8770
- 1467-8608
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review