The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs – empirical evidence from German companies
Open accessAbstract
Socially responsible business and ethical behaviour of companies have been of interest to academia and practice for decades. But the focus has almost exclusively been on large corporations while small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SME) have not received as much attention. Thus, this paper focuses on socially responsible business practices of SME entrepreneurs or owner–managers in Germany. Based on the assumption that decision‐makers in SMEs are the central point where all business activities start, members of a German entrepreneurs association were approached in the course of a qualitative and quantitative survey. They were asked to assess in what way their social responsibility is expressed in specific management practices towards selected stakeholder groups. These practices in turn were assumed to result in perceived positive reactions of the respective stakeholders and subsequently to positively influence the firm's financial performance, i.e. cost reductions and increase in profits. In the paper, a research model is presented that elaborates the relationship between an SME executive's social responsibility and the value creation of a firm, i.e. whether (personal) values create (economic) value. It was found that socially responsible management practices towards employees, customers and to a lesser extent society have a positive impact on the firm and its performance. As such, values can create additional value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Cited by
Cantele, S., & Zardini, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.016 · Cited by 432
Two Decades of Sustainability Management Tools for SMEs: How Far Have We Come?
Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2016) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12154 · Cited by 414
Williams, S., & Schaefer, A. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1740 · Cited by 377
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2837 · Cited by 291
Sánchez-Infante Hernández, J. P., Yañez-Araque, B., & Moreno-García, J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119774 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammann, E., Habisch, A., & Pechlaner, H.
- Venue
- Business Ethics: A European Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-22
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-51
- ISSN
- 0962-8770 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8608
- OpenAlex
- W1987796771
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs – empirical evidence from German companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01547.x
- The paper
- Hammann, E., Habisch, A., & Pechlaner, H. (2009). Values that create value: socially responsible business practices in SMEs – empirical evidence from German companies. Business Ethics: A European Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01547.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.