The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Categorization of Above and Below Spatial Relations by Young Infants
Abstract
3 experiments using the familiarization-novelty preference procedure were conducted to investigate whether 3-month-old infants could form categorical representations of the spatial relations above and below. In Experiment 1, one group of infants familiarized with exemplars depicting a dot in different positions above a horizontal bar displayed a subsequent visual preference for a novel category exemplar (dot below bar) that was paired with a familiar category exemplar (dot in novel position above bar). A second group of infants presented with exemplars in which the dot appeared in variable locations below the bar also responded preferentially to a novel category exemplar (dot above bar) when it was paired with a familiar category exemplar (dot in new position below bar). These preferences did not result from the salience of vertical up-down changes in dot position or the encoding of dot positions relative to an internal horizontal midline (Experiment 3) or from an inability to discriminate the members of each category (Experiment 2), but rather would seem to be a consequence of the ability to represent categorically the spatial relations above and below. The data provide evidence for early categorical organization in human spatial memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801
Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps
Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197683 · Cited by 655
Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory.
McNamara, T. P., Hardy, J. K., & Hirtle, S. C. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.211 · Cited by 323
Cited by
The logical structure of the world
Maddy, P. (2007) · Second Philosophy · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273669.003.0018 · Cited by 665
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Newcombe, N. S., Filipowicz, A. T., & Chang, A. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12165 · Cited by 351
Development of spatial cognition
Vasilyeva, M., & Lourenco, S. F. (2012) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1171 · Cited by 155
Infants lost in (peripersonal) space?
Bremner, A. J., Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.003 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, P. C.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-58
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4241913127
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Categorization of Above and Below Spatial Relations by Young Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00734.x
- The paper
- Quinn, P. C. (1994). The Categorization of Above and Below Spatial Relations by Young Infants. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00734.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.